Yesterday I laid out Cindy Kunsmanβs response to the toxic and downright bratty Botkin sisters, Anna Sophia and Elizabeth, who are claiming ten years on that Cindyβs blog has harmed them. Today I am publishing the letter they sent her. They are trying to claim that the letter is βprivileged communicationβ, instead of what it actually is, an attempt to manipulate and guilt Cindy in retracting her very helpful words on toxic Quiverfull.
I had added italics to their quotes of Cindyβs words and direct quotes of psy manuals/information. There are a few sic spelling/grammar notations in italics too. But where the italics and bolds are that they placed in the original document are there. Grammarly puked and malfunctioned when I ran this through. Holy run on sentences Batman?
Cindy Kunsman had a MSW and DSW review her work before she posted it on the aptly named βBotkin Syndromeβ describing when parents are too enmeshed with their children. Funny too because Botkin Syndrome is a type of hepatitis.
I wonder if Cindy can sue them for harassment. The sisters apparently kept calling Cindyβs local post office trying to find out if the letter than been delivered. That is starting to sound a lot stalker like from here. They are claiming Cindy stalked them, but they are the ones calling around about Cindy.
~~~~~~~~
January 10, 2019
Dear Mrs. Kunsman,
Greetings in Christ. We are writing, first of all, to thank you for your obvious desire to help the hurting, rescue those in bondage, and illuminate the way for those walking dark paths. The need for this is especially obvious as the reality of dysfunctional family dynamics, abuse and victim grooming within the conservative Christian world comes more and more to light. In fact, the more we read your websites, the more weβve come to realize that we really are fighting some common enemies.
We also appreciate the helping hand and listening ear that you extend on your blogs to anyone who comes to you for help. Weβre writing to you with the hope that that compassion will be extended to us as well, as we come to you with our own unusual story of abuse.
We grew up in a happy, healthy, functional home where Mom and Dadβs love for each other and the Lord formed the core of our family life. Boys and girls were respected equally; all of us were giving the choice to pursue the passions and opportunities that interested us most. We were each individually encouraged to develop our convictions and opinions from our own studies of Scripture, even when we came to conclusions that were controversialβ¦ and even when we wanted to write publicly about these controversial opinions.
When we did publish these controversial opinions, plenty of people disagreed with us both in person and online. Weβve been grateful for the criticism which has humbled us, sharpened us, and helped us refine our thinking (an ongoing work.)
But not every critique of our work wasΒ objective or honest, or dealt with only what was truly factual. One complete stranger, who had never met us or made any attempt to contact us, projected the dynamics of her own childhood home onto our family, diagnosed us long-distance with a perverse psychological disorder, presented a speculative (and untrue) life story of our family as factual, attributing teachings to us that we actually teach against, and made our family name synonymous with a mental disease, sexual perversion, incest, and cult-ism.
Using our name as the trademark for the type of incestuous family dynamics she was trying to spotlight on her blog, she said, was a choice prompted largely by the increase in web traffic that happened every time she connected us with those dynamics. We would like to believe that she was motivated not by a malicious desire to hurt our family, but a genuine and noble desire to protect other families from pain and harm by getting her message out. But if this is the case, she needs to know about some very real pain and harm she is causing to the real people who are still paying the price for her decision. In short: No matter where any of the Botkin siblings go, or what we attempt to do, or who we meet, or who we marry, or who our children are weβre all just one Google search away from being labeled βcultic,β (sic) βdiseasedβ or a βperverted familyβ because of this one womanβs publications.
And after reading the disgusting mischaracterizations (sic) of who we βreallyβ are, we donβt blame anyone who has decided over the last ten years to drop our friendship, cut us off, refuse to do business with us, shun us as people, or warn our neighbors, our community, and the rest of the internet about us.
Mrs. Kunsman, our parents have never abused us, bullied us, deprived us of opportunities, or used us in any ways for their own personal gain.
But you have.
And while we girls have been willing to live with abuse for the last ten years, we believe that we owe it to our brothers, their wives, and our three nieces and six nephews who all carry the name Botkin and have lives of their own, to appeal to you to end this. Yes, youβre harming us with your gross mischaracterizations (sic) of what we teach, but more than that, you are harming people who are not in any way responsible for what we teach.
To try to understand where youβre coming from, we recently combed every single page of βOvercoming Botkin Syndromeβ and βUnder Much Grace.β One thing we found there was a lot of helpful material about how to recognize when you are dealing with abusive and unhealthy relationship dynamics. Another was the story of your own painful abuse history, which gives us a lot of sympathy for where youβre coming from (and we are deeply sorry for all that youβve gone through.) But here were a few more things we discovered. Please take these observations in the spirit in which they are meant β an appeal from your sisters in Christ to consider whether you have treated us as you would be treated.
- You did not engage our actual writings, and words (or practices), but instead bore false witness about both our teachings and practices.
You do claim to critique our teachings (which you have every right to do, by the way,) but instead of finding your critiques full of actual quotes by us, we found none. Instead, we found you quoting others, many who teach things we have always taught against β such as unquestioning obedience to parents, women as lesser beings, woman as manβs natural enemy β and describing these are our teachings. This is no small errorβ¦ especially for a website all about proclaiming the truth.
You also claim to tell our familyβs life story and theological background, and furthermore, to have special insight into the inner workings of our family relationships due to your own family background (e.g. βWhat I can readily recognize is the pattern and the rules, both written and unwritten. β¦I did grow up with a devotion to my depressed and dysfunctional family that needed me to perpetuate it in order to survive the pains of life. I can spot the patterns a mile away. And I know well, along with every other adult child of a family trying to survive some pain of life, the destructive outcomes that the patterns produce. β¦I know well the role of the enablerβ¦β http://botkinsyndrome.blogspot.com/2008/07/what-does-literature-on-family.html) What you present as historical fact and educated diagnosis, though, are total speculations about the private lives of complete strangers whose real history you have little or no real information about, and whose family dynamics you have no special insight because they are actually not at all similar to the ones you describe growing up with.
And the mistruths (sic) you publish are not inconsequential. Among other things, you accuse us of practicing a form of incest, describe us as having a mental disease, and liken our father to murderous cult-leader Jim Jones.
- You did not care enough about either the truth βor usβ to reach out, either to verify if any of the details you were publishing about us were true, or, to see if we needed help.
We believe the sincerity of your desire to see those in bondage set free, and the hurting comforted. But if you truly believed, as you profess, that we ourselves were in a cruel, painful bondage⦠why instead recklessly tar and feather us, without double-checking the facts, with such callous disregard for our emotional and spiritual health, our safety, our reputations, our opportunities and our future lives?
- Whatβs more, you even misappropriated medical terms and abused the trust people had in your credibility as a medical professional by creating a βsyndromeβ to describe the dysfunction you thought you saw in people you had never met.
This goes against psychiatric and psychological codes of ethics. You donβt claim to be a licensed psychologist, but as setting yourself up as a teacher and advisor on psychological issues, you surely are aware that this conduct goes against the βGoldwater ruleβ (βIt is unethical for a psychiatrist to offer a professional opinion unless he or she has conducted an examinationβ) and the APA Ethics Code, which exhorts psychologists to βprovide opinions of the psychological characteristics of individuals only after they have conducted an examination of the individuals adequate to support their statements or conclusions.β You assure your readers many times that you are not making an official medical diagnosis, but these ethical guidelines arenβt about making a diagnosis, theyβre about giving an opinion.
- You exploited our names and faces for your own gain.
You rightly hate seeing others treat women as less than human, or exploit women for their own personal gain (a hot-button issue of ours as well,) but that is exactly how you have treated us. Our name is driving up your web traffic and while we (and others connected with us) in turn suffer a loss of dignity, privacy, reputation, opportunities, livelihood and relationships. Please consider: If you were engaging and describing our familyβs teachings and practices honestly, rather than projecting onto us false teachings from your own background (e.g. Bill Gothard, the Shepherding Movement) β for instance, if you would simply quote us on our beliefs instead of using other teachersβ words to describe βourβ beliefs β the use of our name would seem more sincere, less like a thoughtless bid for more online attention.
βI never intended for βBotkin Syndromeβ to take off as a descriptive term for the enmeshment and dysfunctional family dynamicsΒ that the followers of Patriocentricity describe in great detail! It was a tongue-in-cheek comment. Butβ¦ I have been overwhelmed to say the least by the comments of people in favor of the term and the dynamics described that I think it is here to stay. Of ALL the material that I have posted online in the past concerning spiritual abuse, I have received more POSITIVE feedback about this Botkin Syndrome information than all the other feedbackΒ combined.β http://undermuchgrace.blogspot.com/2008/07/announcing-overcoming-botkin-syndrome. html||more.
βI donβt exactly get it myself, but many people find them fascinating, and posts about them here on this site remain along the perennially popular.β http://undermuchgrace.blogspot.com/2012/02/botkin-update-and-botkin-success-story.html
- You have misappropriated the name βBotkin,β hurting even those Botkins who donβt share our beliefsΒ β and their friends and associates.
Our concern is not that youβre going to war against dysfunctional and destructive family dynamics. Our concern is also not that you are publicly disagreeing with our teaching. Our concern is that you used the real name of a very real family, full of real people trying to live their own healthy and productive lives, who do not represent the practices youβre describingβ¦ as the mascot of those practices.
The accusations are equally false for all of us β those of us who have written books, and those who havenβt. But itβs especially unjust that your defaming of our family name endlessly stalks the lives of those that have done nothing that concerns you. Did youΒ know there are people who call for boycotts on our brothersβ businesses on the grounds that they sexually use their sisters? And that they link backΒ to overcomingbotkinsyndrome.com as their source for this lie? Did you know that even distantly-related family and friends run into major barriers in life on the grounds of being connected with a βPerverted familyβ βΒ and that you are the sole cited source for this? If you could have foreseen this sort of thing, and if the concern you claim to have for the welfare of innocent people is genuine, we canβt imagine that you would have pursued so heartless and thoughtless a maneuver to drive more traffic to your websites.Β
This is why we canβt turn the other cheek any longer. Youβre not just striking us; youβre striking the people we love, and with whom you have no quarrel. And we cannot allow this damage to them to continue.
Mrs. Kunsman, weβre appealing to you as a professing follower of Christ. (Editorβs note: Originally this had βProfessionalβ It was a typo from transcription.) Scripture says if your brother sins against you, to appeal to him personally. You have sinned against us, and against people you donβt even know exist, by bearing false witness and slandering us. You have stolen from us β reputations, friendships, opportunities, business, sexual dignity and privacy, our very name. You have exploited us as your own profit.
We appeal to you, in the name of Christ, for His sake, for the sake of your sisters in Christ, and for the sake of your own cause: Please prove your compassion for the abused by not abusing us, our brothers, our sisters-in-law, our mother and father, or our nieces and nephews anymore. And please demonstrate your concern for truth by removing all libelous βinformationβ and speculative accusations from your website.
Weβre not asking you to stop trying to help real victims, but we are appealing to you to remove the name βBotkinβ everywhere from your site except where you are honestly engaging our actual words βΒ and that includes every use of the term βBotkin Syndrome,β as well as all speculative βbiographicalβ material about our family and our father.Β Please inform us by January 22nd, 2019, of your plans for action, public retraction, and restitution. You can contact us at (removed email address for their own idiotic clamoring for βPrivacyβ)
We thank you in advance for doing the right thing. May God bless your endeavor to help set free those truly in bondage⦠and grant you healing from the hurts you have suffered at the hands of others.
In Christ,
Anna Sophia and Elizabeth Botkin
~~~~~~~~~~~~
Breathtakingly blaming, shaming, abusive, accusatory and demeaning. They just proved all of Cindyβs points about their lifestyle in this letter. This is Evangelical bullying at its finest. Clueless entitlement and bratty.
Hereβs a thought. While there is a great deal I could say here let me just state I still hold a social workers licensure and challenge the Botkin sisters to allow me to examine them to see if Cindyβs words are true. Ball is in your court, Anna Sophia and Elizabeth. Are you strong enough to allow a real licensed mental health advocate to examine you?
Also, Cindy is not a psychiatrist. Those rules you oh so piously spouted do not apply to the personal opinions of anyone not a psychiatrist.
Stay in touch! Like No Longer Quivering on Facebook:
If this is your first time visiting NLQ please read our Welcome page and our Comment Policy! Commenting here means you agree to abide by our policies.
Copyright notice: If you use any content from NLQ, including any of our research or Quoting Quiverfull quotes, please give us credit and a link back to this site. All original content is owned by No Longer Quivering and Patheos.com
Read our hate mail at Jerks 4 Jesus
Check out todayβs NLQ News at NLQ Newspaper
Contact NLQ at SuzanneNLQ@gmail.com