Cross Examined
When apologist Greg Koukl critiques atheist morality, it’s hard to imagine that he’ll get so many things wrong. Read more
When apologist Greg Koukl critiques atheist morality, it’s hard to imagine that he’ll get so many things wrong. Read more
How about an argument from the Christian standpoint for a change? This is the Transcendental Argument as presented in my novel “Cross Examined.” Read more
How do we evaluate evidence? This often underlies disagreement between atheists and Christians. Here’s a procedure to get everyone on the same page. Read more
Respected Christian philosopher Alvin Plantinga wants to show that the idea of evolution is self-defeating. Unfortunately, he’s outside his area of expertise. His argument hasn't convinced biologists, and it shouldn’t convince you. Read more
In my never-ending quest to find a reasonable defense for the Christian claim of objective morality, I consider the argument of another apologist. Read more
I’ve come across a single bias (in many forms) that seems to underlie Christian arguments. Read more
Creationists like to point to discarded ideas that science has left behind—geocentrism, Piltdown Man, ether, the steady-state universe. What they don’t seem to realize is that science’s ability to change in the face of new facts is a strength, not a weakness. Read more
This is the final part of Frank Turek's comprehensive apologetic for Christianity. He says that the Problem of Evil actually works in his favor, and the fruits of science are proof of God's existence. See if you were more impressed than I was. Read more
Turek makes the popular mistake of confusing “morality” and “objective morality.” A dictionary would clear up a lot of Turek’s confusion. Read more
Some of the New Testament parables are pretty good. They make a useful point, and they add to our moral vocabulary. I explore a few of the recent apologetic parables that, unfortunately, weren’t made to the same standard. Read more
Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In