Exposing Planned Parenthood

Have you ever seen anyone actually happy about possibly killing an infant pre-born girl, even after admitting, “everything’s already pretty much developed?”

Watch this video of a woman who goes into a Planned Parenthood in Austin, Texas and tells them that she only wants to terminate the pregnancy if she’s carrying a girl.

Does Planned Parenthood condemn this or condone this “gendercide?”

 

 

Lila Rose and her Live Action team are fearless in taking on Planned Parenthood, so learn more about them here.  After Roe v. Wade is finally overturned, they’ll be remembered as heroes in the fight for life.

You might also enjoy:

Connect with me further by:

  • Emily

    Thank You for sharing this Bristol. I cannot understand why so many babies are aborted. Watching a child grow and learn is one of the most rewarding things in life, it may not be the easiest job in the world, but it’s totally worth it.

  • Pingback: Exposing Planned Parenthood | Palin Promotions

  • Pingback: Exposing Planned Parenthood | The Palin Twibe

  • Thomas Hubbard

    BUSTED, to think that the Democrats have approved of this, I need to get this word out and watch them loose votes.

  • Vanessa Stockwell

    Even though I’m pro-choice in certain circumstances I can clearly see how wrong this is. Rape, incest, mother or child having an illness mental or physical, I can understand, but just because the baby is a girl? Idk, that’s a bit much even for me.

    • amy august

      understandable yet still killing a baby.

  • JustAMom

    I hope Bristol will take a look at this link and print a correction. The anti-abortion group that released this video edited out parts in order to reinforce their narrative. Specifically they left out the fact that the counselor recommended that the woman purchase insurance that covers prenatal care in case she chooses to continue the pregnancy, asks her if she has “definitely decided” that she wants to terminate and suggests adoption as an option. Leslie Kantor, vice president of education for Planned Parenthood Federation of America, said the video was “selectively and heavily edited in order to distort what actually happened.”

    Here is the link: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/06/01/live-action-planned-parenthood-videos_n_1563241.html

    • CJ

      JustAMom…….Just wondering……..have you ever witnessed an abortion?
      I have. Would you like to??
      IF, in fact, the video was edited as you stated is of no consequence whatsoever. The fact remains that PP is complicit with the HORRENDOUS act of MURDERING millions upon millions of LIVE BABIES AND THE FACT THAT THEY COULD CARE LESS “WHY” THE MOTHER CHOOSES TO DO SO AND IS WILLING, ABLE AND READY TO RIP APART
      A BRAND NEW LIFE FOR ANY REASON, LET ALONE SEX PREFERENCE,
      DEFINES THE TRUE AGENDA WHICH LURKS BEHIND THE STENCH OF THEIR WALLS! MAY I SUGGEST YOU DO SOME INVESTIGATIVE RESEARCH ON THEIR BELOVED IDOL AND “FOUNDER”, MARGARET SANGER? And after you have SAFELY tucked, hugged and kissed your precious children goodnight, you might want to GOOGLE “ABORTION IMAGES” to witness REALITY in living color. As a Medical Professional,
      I rest my case.

      • Matthais777

        Yup. Watched them. Seen them. Ugly little piles of flesh. Don’t have kids myself yet, so i borrowed a friends as a though expirment. Nope, still don’t see the connection between the two. Why don’t you try looking up Ectopic pregnancy surgery pictures sometime? Pretty ugly to. And did it ever occur to you that it might be about the right itself, not the choices? If i’m working at a bookstore, and you walk in and ask for a book on the bible, I’m sorely tempted to guide you to the ethics section, and i might drop a few hints to that effect, but i can’t deny you it. Same with this worker, who thinks that this person is horrible for “gendercide” as you call it, but knows she still has the right to make that choice.

      • JustAMom

        Bristol’s post concerns a specific incident which has now been proven (at the link you can view the unedited video) to be dishonest. She should acknowledge this just like she did last week when she quoted an incorrect figure of DS abortions.

        • ceil

          It was not dishonest, I watched the video. the counselor never once pointed out to her the outrageousness of killing her baby ONLY because she is a girl!! Unless, and until I hear abortion providers verbally saying to kill a baby ONLY because of their sex, I will always believe PP is evil. Open your eyes to the evil that you are supporting

    • CJ

      There is no dishonesty in what Bristol posted at all. This is a 2 part video. I saw both parts and was unable to find the discrepancies you refer to because I heard everything you said was edited.

  • Thomas Hubbard

    Bristol, if you look south to Phoenix Arizon you may see a Mushroom cloud. I sent the video to my Mornone stepmother who is very patriotic and a Momma Grizzly in her own way and lover of children. I’m sure the video is going viral as of now. I can tell you this Obama and his gang are not well liked by her in the least bit. Beware Planned Parenthood there’s one mad lady heading your way. No I am not a Mormone myself and never has been forced on me.

  • abb

    I understand not everyone is Christian, nor has faith in the word of God, so i cant argue my opinion of abortion being wrong based off my Christian viewpoints, but solely on the fact that it is killing an unborn child. Abortions aren’t just offered to the “low-life’s” but also to many better off people are getting them just out of selfishness or convenience or embarrassment of being pregnant.

    Joseppi and grizzlymom-
    Before you try to make assumptions in an attempt to justify your statements of the bible, read Galatians. But in case you lack the time or effort to read ill quote some of it to you. “Christ has redeemed us from the curse of the law, having become a curse for us” (Galatians 3:13 NKJV)
    A large majority of this book is about abandoning the old law (covenant) and living the new one because Jesus was the ultimate sacrifice. Under the old (covenant…law) Gods people made sacrifices to cover their sins because they couldn’t be perfect. Now because of Jesus’ sacrifice we don’t have to be perfect. So yes, same God in old and new, but instead of sacrifices, all he asks is faith. If we live by faith the rest will follow. 

    • http://non82 eMillie

      abb,
      Excellent!!!! Very well said.

    • JustAMom

      I think you are missing their point. Regardless of who the laws were to be applied to why would God instruct people to do those things? Why would God impregnate a 14 year old girl just to provide salvation? I realize that the stories have been romanticized and idolized to the point that people don’t really look at their content anymore…but they should. If I started a new religion today and got millions of people to believe similar actions that are in the Bible most Christians would say I’m a nutjob. People do realize that the greatest sinners in the Bible are Adam and Eve…they were so bad that God cast them out of paradise. Yet they are the model for who we pass laws affecting all citizens? How does that make sense?

      • ceil

        oh please!!! get a life…”impregnate a 14 year old!”……dont disparage things you dont understand. Many people believe it was the PERFECT way for God to provide salvation.

        • JustAMom

          How am i disparaging things? Mary was 13 or 14 and she was pregnant. If a 13 or 14 year old child became pregnant today people would be horrified.

  • Justin

    This makes me sick to watch. To sit there and talk about killing a child like there is nothing to it. Im sure the Nazis were cold like that to when they killed the Jews in concentration camps.

    • CJ

      Justin, I empathize with the way you are feeling. Unfortunately, the Nazi ideology didn’t die when Hitler did. It remains very much alive and kickin’ to this day. Watch and listen carefully. It is right smack in front of us.

  • http://!!! Tim Kelley

    Unbelievable…my blood boils over al this selfishness…human sacrifice on the alater of self gratification. I wonder what the earliest preemie is and what the latest abortion is…becuse if you were to kill a preemie after they were born it would be considered muder but if you kill a baby just because it is in the womb- it’s okay it;s abortion. FOOLS

    • CJ

      Tim, you are SPOT ON! I’d like to add that by the time a woman begins to experience some of the early signs of pregnancy, which would place her in the first trimester phase, an abortion is never done prior to 6 wks of gestation (development) because the baby needs to be a certain size to avoid what is called an “incomplete abortion” which can have serious complications aside from the usual risks which can result from abortion in general. At 6 wks, the baby’s HEART BEAT can now be seen on sonogram though it began to beat before this and he/she responds to touch in case there are those who believe that they are getting rid of a mere, insignificant “blob of tissue”.
      If I understood you correctly, you asked about what the cut off period is for abortion. Sadly, I have to say that it is LEGAL IN OUR COUNTRY to abort even into the third (last) trimester. This means that any baby at any stage of LIFE BEFORE BIRTH can be legally exterminated! The procedure used to terminate life in the 3rd trimester is called PARTIAL BIRTH ABORTION, which can be seen demonstrated on YouTube using a model, and may also be done in the 2nd trimester. I prefer to avoid being too graphic and detailed here because what is done is so vile, so hideous, so disturbing and malevolent, that it is best to leave it be. However, it is important to know it is a 2 – 3 day process in which the “Physician”, and I use the term loosely, has to make sure that the baby leaves the birth canal feet first because herein lies the differentiating rationale between what is and is not considered MURDER. Here’s the legal loophole. 90% of the baby is pulled out by the feet to gain access to the lower portion of the back of the head. The Physician must make sure to keep most of the baby’s head inside the vaginal canal while he completes the process. LEGALLY, AS LONG AS THE HEAD REMAINS INSIDE THE MOM, JUST A FEW SMALL INCHES FROM HIS FIRST CRY AND EMBRACE, THE BABY IS NOT CONSIDERED “BORN” AND THEREFORE, IT IS LEGAL TO END HIS/HER PRECIOUS LIFE…………………………………………………..HOW DARE WE!
      WHAT ARE WE?
      MARANATHA!


CLOSE | X

HIDE | X