Not quite five years ago, Philip wrote a series here on what it would look like to write and teach what he called very recent history. “If you were writing a history of the United States in the 21st century,” he asked, “what would you include, and how would you tell the story?” This afternoon, it’s struck me that anyone taking on a religious version of that assignment would surely have to tell the story of one particularly significant American Christian: Beth Moore.
— Religion News Service (@RNS) March 9, 2021
Today Bob Smietana reported that Moore told Religion News Service last Friday that “I am still a Baptist, but I can no longer identify with Southern Baptists… I love so many Southern Baptist people, so many Southern Baptist churches, but I don’t identify with some of the things in our heritage that haven’t remained in the past.” While LifeWay will continue to distribute Moore’s books, she will no longer publish through that publishing wing of the Southern Baptist Convention, and Moore and her husband have started looking for a new church home.
(Important as this is within a purely Baptist context, read the article and you’ll see that this one decision connects to all sorts of larger themes central to any recent history of evangelicalism in America: the role of women in that movement, sexual abuse within its churches, debates over race and racism, and the meaning of evangelical support for Donald Trump.)
Keeping in mind Philip’s caution that we “tend to be very presentist, seeing significance in things fresh off the headlines,” that this afternoon’s headline has stirred such a strong response shouldn’t be a surprise to our readers. Since 2018, when Moore wrote an open letter to evangelical men, calling out the misogyny she had experienced in her years as a Bible teacher and author in the SBC, we’ve written several posts about her:
• Most of them have come from Beth Allison Barr, whose own book challenging conservative Baptist and evangelical views on women is due out next month. In April 2018, she explained how “Beth Moore could influence women against evangelical ideas about biblical womanhood,” then a year later both offered a historical perspective on Moore as a preaching woman and unpacked a Twitter debate between Moore and Baptist theologian Denny Burk on complementarianism.
• Speaking of… over the weekend, Burk had criticized Kristin Du Mez’s book, Jesus and John Wayne, which prompted this response (among many others):
What I have zero respect for is when people read books that confront their stands or interpretations and come out of it having learned absolutely nothing. Never, “I was convicted about that because I think she’s got a point there.” Never, “I see how that could be abused.”
— Beth Moore (@BethMooreLPM) March 8, 2021
Seeing that tweet not only reminded me that Kristin had mentioned Beth Moore’s criticism of Trump in J&JW, but that she once blogged about Moore on Anxious Bench, in a post that seems even more timely now than it did in 2019.
To help explain why “networks” can matter more than denominational structures within evangelicalism, Kristin pointed to the example of Beth Moore: “As the beloved Bible Study writer with a Twitter following approaching 900,000, Moore has long ministered to evangelical women without disrupting the authority of conservative evangelical networks and gatekeepers.” So now that Moore has publicly distanced herself from the country’s largest evangelical denomination, Kristin’s final observation seems all the more salient:
It remains to be seen what sort of power Beth Moore and the network of evangelical women she has forged will exert in the face of conservative evangelical networks…. In many ways, however, the future of American evangelicalism will unfold in terms of the relative power struggles within and among such networks and coalitions.
• Just last month, another Beth Moore tweet inspired me to look back at the recent history of the expression, “Jesus is not a Republican or a Democrat.” But let me close this brief recap by mentioning my first Beth Moore post…
In the spring of 2018, I imagined a 22nd century historian looking at our present time not as something very recent but quite distant, and asking what had taken place to revive evangelicalism in the 21st century. I suggested Moore’s open letter on sexism and misogyny as a key primary source: not just as an artifact of evangelicals finally taking a hard look at some of their movement’s most deeply-seated problems, but as an early example of women taking leadership of the evangelicalism that — in my hypothetical — had been reformed, renewed, and revived.
But first, I suspect that evangelicalism will go through a painful period of realignment, as people much less famous than Beth Moore make their own choices about how they will and won’t participate in institutions like the SBC. And even if she doesn’t work so clearly within such networks, I suspect that Beth Moore will continue to influence many of those decisions. As Beth (Barr) told Smietana, “If she walks away, she’s going to carry a lot of these women with her.”