What does Sarah Palin Think about Condoleezza Rice being Vice President?

What does Sarah Palin Think about Condoleezza Rice being Vice President? July 16, 2012

Mom, of course, was the first Republican woman to run for Vice President.  So, what does she think about the rumor circulating on television, Facebook, and Twitter that Mitt Romney might choose Condoleezza as VP?  Of course, this is only speculation… however, I thought some of you might be interested in this recent interview.

Watch here:


You might also enjoy these articles on the Faith and Family Channel:

Connect with me further by:


"Charges ? ? ? That's Funny.... Bottom Feeder Down ..."

How Else Was ‘He Gonna Get ..."
"Thank God they are getting help and being saved now.Thank you, President Obama!"

The Massacre of Christians in Iraq: ..."
"Paying for praying - only hypocritical, greedy, materialistic Pharisees would whine that the restaurant gave ..."

Restaurant Stops “Prayer Discounts” after Atheists ..."
"Her "belief" in this discount goes against our laws. That is why she was threatened ..."

Restaurant Stops “Prayer Discounts” after Atheists ..."

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!

What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment
  • MotherBush

    Whats wrong with your Mom’s face?

    • Truth101

      What is wrong with your face?

      • MotherBush

        Must be all the egg on her face from not being invited to speak at the RNC 😉

  • Lissa

    I have the same concerns about Condi Rice that your mom tactfully spoke of …. she talks of being pro-choice, and she also favors gay marriage. I have long admired Ms Rice and her work in the Bush 43 administration as Secretary of State, although I part ways with those very liberal views she holds. Like your mom, I am aware that the Veep does not legislate, however, the Veep is the president of the Senate and if there were a tie vote, they would cast the tie-breaker vote. So yes, her pro-choice and pro-gay marriage views could come into play and have an effect on federal legislation. So, I would not be supportive of her being vice president. I hope your mom can get behind a true conservative to support for Veep, like Allen West!

    What matters is not race or gender, but being a true, constitution supporting conservative is!

    • MotherBush

      True constitution supporting conservatives don’t believe in the government telling women what they can do with their reproductive organs. Nor do they believe in telling American citizens who they can or cannot choose to love.

      • Kara B.

        It says in the constitution that everyone has a right to LIFE, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness. Last time I checked killing babies did not involve them living.

        • MotherBush

          Well Kara that phrase does not appear in our constitution. Why are all conservatives so misinformed?

          • MotherBush

            Seriously. Are you allergic to facts and information?

        • GrizzlyMom

          Ummm…Kara that phrase is in our Declaration of Independence. Isn’t it amazing MotherBush how conservatives constantly tout the constitution but obviously have never even read it.

  • Just wanted to let you know Geraldine Ferraro was the 1st female VP candidate before someone hateful lets ya know. I admire you and your family so much and hate what you have to go through on a daily basis. I wish your Mom would run for President, God knows we need her 🙂

  • and I just saw where you said first Republican woman, nevermind 🙂

  • robert

    She would be qualified. But after the fiasco of Sarah, no chance.

  • Delbert Rhodes

    Would love so much to see Sarah in the VP position if not President

  • Gary Ernsthausen

    I am happy that the GOP and Mitt overlook Sarah being at the convention, it is like saying ‘Thanks folks’ now I can run 3rd party on my own and make this a REAL EXCITING election. I can see Sarah giving 3 speeches a week across America until Nov. 6th, Todd and Bristol on TV, so sorry Mitt you didn’t get to say much. This is new to Americans and will enjoy it.

    • MotherBush

      That sounds like a wonderful idea Gary. Run Sarah Run!

  • Emma Lora

    C. Rice definitely more experienced than sitting president!. The better of some other GOP possibilities.. not so sure.

    • MotherBush

      How is she more experienced? Examples please.

      • sodakhic

        Read her 59,000 pages of emails. Bushy

      • Emma Lora

        She served under both Pres. Bush(s) (12yrs) plus more. if you really want to know it would be easy to check out… just google.

        • GrizzlyMom

          Emma she has an impressive academic career but her political one has stunk. You can’t possibly think Iraq was worth it. Google Condelezza Rice + PDB + Richard Clarke.

          • Emma Lora

            It has to do w/ choices. Like I said she has more 12+ yrs in politics than BHO. Do I like everything she has done.. no. but I like very little what BHO has done. so it is a matter of choices. I have no desire to change your mind, nor validate you and there are much better qualified people to listen too for political analysis. I avoid condescending, snarky tones as a style for ” information”. Choices, it is all about choices… who we listen to, who we believe, who we validate or not. etc. etc. etc.

          • GrizzlyMom

            It has nothing to do with “choices”….it has to do with FACTS. You state about the Ms. Rice has “more 12+ years in politics than BHO”. This is WRONG. President Obama’s career in politics started in 1997 as a state senator. He has been in politics for 15 years. Your side likes to make fun of him by calling him a “community organizer”. The leave off the part that this was “church-based” serving 8 catholic parishes. He also served as a civil rights attorney and a senior lecturer teaching constitutional law as well as serving on the board of directors for several organizations. How are any of these facts snarky or condescending? And for the record I admire Condaleeza Rice and think she would have made a much better choice in 2008 than Sarah Palin. In fact why don’t you compare those two for me? I’m sure you feel like Sarah Palin is much more accomplished and experienced than Ms. Rice.

  • haley

    if Romney knew what was up he’d choose Sarah Palinnn!

    • Emma Lora

      “facts” can be percieved however people want to use them. So choices to use them to support or another set of “facts” to use to be against… . It all depends on the foundation.. conservative or liberal, or something else.. Choices. My conservative choices has God/Jesus Christ as the ultimate authority. Bible also has been used to support a person’s viewpoint. For me God’s Word established my viewpoint.. instead of using the Bible to support my viewpoint. A difference. A choice I have made and do not impose on another…. nor will another impose theirs on me. A public forum to discuss viewpoints & voting is how people express their different choices on national agendas. Conserv. and Liberals or whatever else.

      Condi Rice was Sec of state and then advisor for Bush 43 (12 yrs)Bho. was comm. org. and then in state senate voting present. In my opinion these jobs(?) I don’t count as experiences. His pres. is a shambles but I do count as experience… failed experience. Your choice to do otherwise if you wish.

      • Emma Lora

        .. to respond to the Condi R. vs S. Palin queston. Why would I wnat to compare? Sounds silly to me. They are not running against each other. Condi has her strengths and S. Palin has her strengths. Once again choices. “Concept for choices’ is very easy concept for me. Very foundational for how & why we think, talk & act the way we do.

        • GrizzlyMom

          Based on your criteria S. Palin didn’t run against President Obama either but you had no problem comparing the two of them. The entire crux of this post is S. Palin speaking on whether Ms. Rice would be a good candidate pick for VP…which is exactly where S. Palin was 4 years ago. Comparing those two actually makes a lot of sense but I somehow doubt you are able to see that.

      • GrizzlyMom

        What are you talking about jobs don’t count as experiences? You stated “she has more 12+ yrs in politics than BHO”. I corrected you with the FACT that President Obama has 15 years in POLITICS. Your words. There is no “perception” here. My statement is the truth and yours is not. If you don’t understand this very basic “concept” then you are not very smart. Should I illustrate this with an example that is easier for you to understand?

        • GrizzlyMomn
          Sarah had 12 years admnistrative experience on a larger scale in government. Obama had
          administrative only in cummunity affairs with Accorn. You don’t get administrative experience
          in the state or national being a senator!!!!!! Obama has proven over and over again he is
          green, green, green and going down a road that is not in the best interest of America!!!
          However, he knows where he wants to take this country.

        • Emma Lora

          Grizz, Your desire for me to answer as you think I should is arrogant. Your perception of experience for being responsible in public service and mine are different. I answered from my perspective. You answered from yours. I don’t validate your perspective and I don’t need your validation for mine …so this is an easy conclusion for me.

          • GrizzlyMom

            Emma, water is made up of 2 hydrogen atoms and 1 oxygen atom. Would you consider this information a “fact” or just my “perception” of a “fact”?

            Jesus died on a cross for you sins and 3 days later flew away into the sky. Is this a “fact” or just your “perception” of a “fact”?

            If you discover that you have a brain tumor do you go to a neurosurgeon or to your local pastor?

            If you chose neurosurgeon would you pick the one who enrolled at the University of Hawaii at Hilo then transferred to Hawaii Pacific University for a semester and then transferred to North Idaho Community College in Coeur d’Alene and then attended the University of Idaho and then attended Matanuska-Susitna College in Alaska and then finally graduated from the University of Idaho or would you go with the guy who graduated magna cum laude from Harvard?

            Are these “facts” or my “perception” of “facts”?

            Respectfully yours,


          • BlueVA

            GrizzlyMom. Rock on.

          • Emma Lora

            Grissley Blue
            aaaahhhh…. scientist, doctors, other professonal “facts” for the most part… not always.. are dependable. Jesus… always true and dependable. Liberal “facts”… hardly ever, close to never, are dependable and trustworthy for the good of the country…
            I don’t need your perceptions to come to this conclusion or any other conservative conclusion.
            Your perception of facts only serve you and the rest of your ilk with your needy agenda.
            Now try to have a nice evening.

          • BlueVA

            Now facts and conclusions are Liberal or Conservative, Emma Lora?

            GrizzlyMom, when you mentioned brain tumors, did ya have someone in mind?? Lol!

  • MotherBush, you have got to be kidding. Our President was a community organizer, he never even ran a lemonade stand. Have you ever seen his college transcripts, his applications to college, or papers he wrote while in college? We all know more about Governor Palin than we do about our president and there is something wrong with that, don’t you agree? He lied about being transparent.
    As for Condi Rice, she traveled all over the world on behalf of our country and not once apologized for the USA. The lady has a backbone and bowed to no one.
    And MotherBush, Sarah Palin is considered to be one hot mamma. I’d like to see how you would look as a mother of 5. By the way, do you have a job, do you live at home with Mom and Dad, who are you mad at , and why?

    • Allison

      So have you seen Sarah’s grades and college papers? Share please, I could use the laugh.

    • MotherBush

      Wow. What an idiotic response. Your examples of Condi Rice being more “qualified” are: 1. She traveled all over the world. 2. She hasn’t apologized for the USA. 3. She has a backbone. 4. She hasn’t bowed to ‘no one’. I would find it hilarious if it weren’t for the fact that you represent a small but very stupid portion of this fine country. Please go educate yourself. Learn to think critically. Question the ideas you’ve been brain-washed with. And for CHRIST’S sake OPEN YOUR MIND.

      • BlueVA

        Sarah Palin is considered “one hot mamma”? What the heck does that have to do with Condi Rice? Eileen, are you in the closet?

  • Pat

    Bristol did your ghost writer write this and your Mom tell you to put that video up?


  • sodakhic

    Media Matters just let out their, diss the Palins, class led by mother bush

    • Emma Lora


      • Emma Lora

        Some posts appear the poster wants validation of their liberal opinions… or more so to “win” the sparing. Their desparation and frustration shows in their unconvincing style of presentation. There are many other sites that will validate them, & celebrate their stance. Their tone here is often arrogant, angry and snarky. Is that it? … they want to be arrogant angry and snarky ? . There is no point moving elsewhere if the other sites are agreeable. They will continue to be desparate and frustrated while grasping on with “clinched fist”s to their positions on a basically conservative site.

  • David

    I do not think many people care about what Sarah Palin thinks about Condoleezza Rice. Her opinion is immaterial to the decision that Romney will make.

  • I think Governor Palin was being polite. I think she believes, like I do, I don’t want a Pro-Choice person that could be close enough to even potentially influence a previously pro-choice president. I also prefer John Bolton at State also. I think the “keep that in mind” was a cautionary statement to Romney.

    • David Allred

      Governor Palin was being polite and respectful of Condi and her ability, but as a Christian lady first she is concerned for the protection of the unborn. I will never vote for anyone who is pro choice unless there is no other choice.

      • BlueVA

        Looks like you’ll have no choice, Mr. Allred. Romney was pro-choice before he was pro-life and only changed his point of view in 2004. That’s a fairly recent “epiphany.” Considering that he’s been gunning to be president since 2006 or 2007, my guess is that the change was politically expedient and not the result of a come-to-Jesus moment.

  • Georgia

    I agree wth your mom that there are others who are far more conservative than Condi Rice. She is pro-Abortion and Pro-Amnesty for illegal aliens, and of course she sings Obama’s praises. As follows:

    Rice Congratulates Obama Tearfully, Says She Is “Especially Proud” Of Obama’s Win (VIDEO)


    Condi Rice on Obama
    “…I couldn’t help enjoying Rice’s genuine excitement about Barack Obama’s victory…Am I a total sap to find Condoleezza Rice’s reaction to Barack Obama’s victory moving? She looked like a little girl on Christmas. She looked 20 years younger, at least. That grim mask of determination and repression was gone…”

    Romney can do much better than RINO Rice.

  • Pat

    Condoleeza Rice would be the best choice for Romney or any running Primary candidate for President.
    She has strength, morals, intelligence, experience, and strong common sense decision making. She is an USA citizen and can prove it. She loves her country and cares about it.

  • Thomas Hubbard

    Hello Bristol
    Your Mother is a lady of Humbleness, Grace, Mercy and Wisdom.

  • aloha43

    No Bristol….you are WRONG:

    Your mother wasn’t the first woman to run for Vice President. Geraldine Ferraro was first.

    Your family can’t seem to check things out before you speak.

    • BlueVA

      Bristol wrote that her mom was the first Republican woman to run for VP. Ferraro was on the Democratic ticket.

      • jojo

        True. Gerri (may she rest in peace) was the very first over all. She was on dem ticket with Mondale. SP was first selected by a repub nominee.

  • bellagrazi

    All future VP nominees will always pale in comparison to your mom, Bristol. She was a breath of fresh air for this country when she was chosen. And she continues to be the leading voice in the conservative movement. Sarah Palin for President, 2016! Please work on it for us, Bristol. America desperately needs her leadership.

    • conanobrian

      Please please please encourage Sarah to run in 2016. Why wait until 2016– she should storm into that convention and take it by force. Late night comedians need Sarah Palin!

    • Georgia

      bellagrazi, I couldn’t agree more! Sarah Palin uplifted this country, as no other VP nominee has ever done. She spoke and still speaks for all God-loving Patriotic American. There is only one Sarah Palin. 2016 will be her year! Sarah Palin for President of the United States, in 2016! We certainly do need her.

      • BlueVA

        Well, she didn’t uplift the country, but she surely was an energizing mouthpiece for all those angry people who resent having a half-black, “secret Mooslim,” “affirmative-action educated,” “Kenyan usurper” for a POTUS.

        • GrizzlyMom

          Couldn’t agree more BlueVA!

        • Emma Lora

          Why Blue!! “secret Mooslim” “affirmative-action educated” “Kenyan usurper”
          energizing mouthpiece etc. etc. I like your style. LOL and to boot.. Grizz right there beside you.
          Of course it is a “I don’t like conservatives” speak write with sarcasm.. but here you are on a conservative blog where we think of this as “hot air going nowhere but up and away.” but you are catching on with the speak-write style I like.

          • GrizzlyMom

            Oh so you think of it as hot air going nowhere but up and away do you? Seems more like crack based on your inability to ignore it. Tay in the wind.

          • BlueVA

            Help me out, GrizzlyMom…WTF is “speak-write style”?

          • GrizzlyMom

            Blue I can only assume that Emma’s “speak-write” style in indicative of how she verbally expresses herself. Why she would admit this and model her writing habits after it is as cloudy as the logic she uses to..wait…i feel an episode of speak-write coming on…the liberal(‘)s desparation at needed constant validation proves that Jesus expects one day for the (really) truth to be self-evident.

  • conanobrian

    Bristol, I loved your show tonight. How many times did Tripp drop the F Bomb? It’s a good idea to scare him about the wolves before he goes to sleep. That way, he will stay under his covers until morning, and you can get some adult time with Gino, or whoever is on the scene these days.

  • Emma Lora

    The Liberals on here are much like the Libs on LSM… Their concept of what they think are “facts” become in their minds “their (faux) power”, (faux) intellectual superiority(??), and “expects” that those who disagree present facts that they want to see, how they want to see it. Those who disagree have their own perceptions of information they choose to evaluate , and don’t need the liberal’s “facts” twisted to conform to their arrogant, desparate emotional needs… their illusions of their power and intellectual superiority. So superficial and needy, and yet we just don’t need or want anything from them. Must be frustrating.

    • GrizzlyMom

      Emma you remind me of your idol Sarah. You use a lot of words but you don’t say very much. And please explain “(faux) intellectual superiority(??)”. Are you questioning your analysis(??) Are the liberal usage of parenthesis supposed to add emphasis?(!)

      And, please stop making simple grammatical errors, such as the comma splice, and other concepts such as and so forth to ensure your pbase and, then “expects” that we take you seriously. Spelling and constructing sentences is (like) so hard!

      • BlueVA

        I’m amazed that you were able to decipher her comment.

        • GrizzlyMom

          LOL! I know Blue!

          • Emma Lora

            For those who need simplicity. Are you here because you need to feel smarter?… and actually think you are? Are you here bothered by what the Palins and (&) friends say, but can’t seems to remove yourselves (leave) to join like-minded (other liberals) blogs? Must you do whatever you can, (like criticize, give orders, use bullish rhetoric (words) to feel superior? That makes you very needy.

      • Emma Lora


        I will continue to write as I like… as my thots flow. You “sound” like a school marm expecting “obedience”. LOL Choice… if you don’t like it … don’t read it.

        • Chad Burke

          “Parenthetical remarks (however relevant) are unnecessary.”
          – Frank L. Visco, How to Write Good
          Here’s to your “(faux) intellectual superiority(??)”
          I know you’re trying to prove a point. I get it, It’s just that you’re your own proof to the counterpoint.

          Here’s another tidbit for you to snack on for a while: we “liberals” are bothered by what the Palins say because to this day everything to come out of Sarah’s mouth has been either self righteous or condemning of others. I have yet to read a singe word of praise from her about someone who wasn’t saying the awful things she was thinking.
          What I hope to see is Bristol breaking the mold and, maybe, if there is a God, developing her own opinions through careful study and critical thinking instead of following in her mothers footsteps. I choose to believe that she might do that, but only because I have leagues more faith in my generation than yours.
          Note: I assume you’re at least in your 40’s when I say your generation. I could be wrong.

          • davidmunns

            Sarah palin does more before breakfast than you do all day.

    • Emma Lora

      Grizz and Blue, I decided to take the time to help you with the translation you needed, However in the future if it is too difficult.. well… don’t worry if the “speak-like” writing overwhelms you. Ignore it. Here goes… hope it helps.
      The facts (as the libs see it) think they have, gives them a sense of power, altho it is just an illusion, they also think they are smarter, superior. and in control of how other people should responds to the libs version of facts. The conserv. however, uses information to establish integrity, honor to the conservative ideas. Libs arguments are noisy, full of phony bravado and lies, void of integrity and useless. (UH OH, I slipped into my speak like writing). Hope that helped.

      • GrizzlyMom

        Thanks Nell!

        • BlueVA


  • David

    Newsweek is out with a thinly sourced “news” piece which attempts to make the argument that conservative Tea Party activists are up in arms over the apparent fact that Sarah Palin has not been invited to the Republican National Convention. Palin is quoted via email as saying, “I’m sure I’m not the only one accepting consequences for calling out both sides of the aisle for spending too much money, putting us on the road to bankruptcy, and engaging in crony capitalism.”

    The notions that Palin has any business speaking at the convention or that her not being invited to do so will have any negative impact on Mitt Romney’s presidential campaign are hilariously, and perhaps purposefully, misguided.

    First, as full disclosure, I produced the only movie in which Sarah Palin has ever appeared and did the most extensive interview ever done with her about the 2008 election. After being her strongest media defender for about two years, she and I no longer communicate largely because I strongly feel that she has “sold out.”

    I am also morally certain, though I admit it is impossible to prove, that the author of the Newsweek piece got Sarah Palin’s email from me after interviewing me for several hours last year (when he suddenly met and spoke with her for the first time three days after I gave him the email address, which he told me he didn’t previously have). Regardless of how he got in contact with Palin, his stories since then have been extremely sympathetic to her. This latest is no different.

    As for the substance of the convention “snub,” why in the world should Sarah Palin be invited to speak at the convention? She is not an elected official. She is not even really a political figure, but rather a celebrity opinion giver.

    Palin is now just a media commentator who has clearly gone out of her way to make it as difficult for the Romney to secure the nomination as possible. She absurdly endorsed Newt Gingrich. She selfishly campaigned for a brokered convention. She even appears to have a very strong personal incentive for President Obama to be reelected so that she can remain at least marginally relevant.

    Quite simply, Sarah Palin has no business speaking at this convention. She made her decisions and she bet on the wrong horse. Now she must accept the consequences (and contrary to her ludicrous claims, those ramifications have nothing to do with “calling out both sides”). She can attend as a Fox News commentator where I am sure she will try hard to diminish Romney at every opportunity.

    Romney is not just right to prevent Palin from speaking because she is not a political ally and someone who clearly does not have his best interest at heart. If she were to speak at the convention it would likely be an unmitigated disaster. There is simply no good scenario for Romney in having Palin speak. Even if she pretended to be supportive, the press would turn it into a major negative for Romney no matter what she said.

    As for Newsweek’s premise that the Tea Party is outraged over having its largely self-appointed Queen not being invited to the big party, this is also without any real basis in fact.

    First of all, contrary to media perception, there is no actual “Tea Party.” It is little more than a series of small conservative groups who have learned that the name is useful in raising money and getting media attention.

    Secondly, when so called Tea Party “leaders” get asked by a Newsweek reporter about Sarah Palin not speaking at the Republican Convention, they know exactly what that person wants them to say and what perspective is more likely to get them prominently quoted in a national publication.

    Finally, while Palin is indeed still personally very popular with some “Tea Party” people, her influence is largely overrated (just take a look at how the Gingrich campaign faired after her endorsement). More importantly than that, there is no evidence that there is even one strong conservative in a swing state who is going to sit home and not take the opportunity to vote against Barack Obama because Sarah Palin didn’t get to speak at a convention.

    This whole story is just another indication that we are watching the final burning embers of what is left of the Sarah Palin media fire. While thanks to her enormous celebrity and charisma it has maintained its heat far longer than most expected, if Romney were to win, it would be permanently extinguished, at least in the political realm.

    As much as it pains me to admit it, that might be one of the most important benefits of that potential result for the future of the Republican Party.

    • conanobrian

      Sarah won’t be speaking at the Republican convention as long as one of her relatives is appearing in some lame tv reality show. No sooner is Bristol’s show finished, then we’ll be treated to the sight of Todd jumping out of helicopters. I also read a rumor that Bristol is thinking of having a wedding on reality TV. With each show, the Palins sink what’s left of Sarah’s credibility. It becomes increasingly clear that the Palins don’t work too hard; they just want to appear on tv.

      By the way, Bristol, if you really want to get involved in real estate, get a real estate license and take some business classes. And, please fin a parenting class to get a hold of your discipline issues with Tripp. Please.

    • “I produced the only movie in which Sarah Palin has ever appeared”

      Really? As I recall, Sarah Palin appeared in two movies — “The Undefeated” and “Media Malpractice” — and neither was produced by a David. Wanna try again? 🙂

  • mary

    Bristol & Willow sure love to use “bad” words on the show. No class at all. Just trash from Wassilla.

  • betty

    Reminds why I do not watch
    TV Preachers. Lets pray for ratings. Lets tell everyone we are Christian. Lets get pregnant at 17. Guess we were not Christians then, just drunk teens! Now we can make money exploiting be good girls.
    Palins all the way !!!!!

  • betty

    Willow Palin’s wrath continues this week. She is the meanest, most bitter teen on TV, and for the life of me, I can’t figure out why. It’s not like she’s the single mom with the seedy, Playgirl posing, deadbeat ex. But I’m not complaining. Honestly, they should seriously consider renaming the show Willow Palin: Life’s a Bitch. She brings a heck of a lot more drama than her more famous big sister Bristol.

    This week, Willow is considering moving to Arizona to go to “hair school.” Of course her wannabe boyfriend Andy is heartbroken and she could care less. It’s almost as though she delights at his torment. “I’m getting a career going. You’re working at an auto shop,” she sneers.

    She later says, shrugging off his hurt feelings, “Life will be fine without Andy. It’s going to be a lot harder for him than for me.” Is her heart as icy as the Alaskan tundra or what? But wait, it gets worse. When they go to a nice restaurant and Andy is confused by the fancy menu, she lays into how stupid he is. He in turn calls her “a bitch.” Well, it’s as though he drove the nail into his own coffin with that jibe. Willow walks outs.

    Though she gets a bit of a reality check while visiting cosmetology school. “Even though I want to be a hairdresser, I never liked playing with hair,” she says. WHAAAATTT? Talk about not thinking things through. “This is gonna be harder than I thought it was gonna be. What am I getting myself into?” she says.

    But it’s hard to imagine her working with clientele. Who wants a stylist who is cold, rude, and mean. Even mom Sarah Palin tells Willow, “You need to learn to be more patient, polite, and gracious.”

    Ultimately, she does decide to head to a year-long program in Phoenix and I’m afraid what this means for the show. Willow was the only thing I looked forward to seeing on Life’s a Tripp.

  • conanobrian

    We can’t decide which f-word Tripp used on your show last night. No matter what the word was, the look on your face was great, Bristol. Don’t bother to discipline Tripp. I’m sure that he’ll grow out of acting up. Or, maybe won’t. He’s your responsibility. I wonder where he hears that language.

  • I think your Mom would make a great Vice President to a President Romney. Sarah would have been my first and only choice for President had she run!

    • c_sense

      Sarah Palin being named as Romney’s Vice Presidential candidate would be too wonderful to be true! She did such a great and thorough job last time around, and the way she spiced up the comedy shows: PRICELESS!