Christians and Communists

There is an odd but very useful source on early Christianity that remains strangely unfamiliar to many historians of that topic. Even less known is the discussion by a totally unexpected nineteenth century source, which provides many insights that are still valuable.

In the late second century, the pagan satirist Lucian wrote the story of one Peregrinus, who  died in the 160s. (He burned himself alive). Lucian presents Peregrinus as a Cynic, a rogue pseudo-philosopher who wanders from city to city, exploiting the gullible. For our purposes, there is a remarkable section when he is taken up by local Christians, who assume he has been persecuted for his faith in Christ. He lives very well off them until he moves on yet again. This is one of the few pagan sources of the period to mention Christians in any detail, even from a hostile point of view. (Some modern scholars treat Peregrinus’s Christian career much more seriously, and I’ll talk about those issues in a later post).

No less interesting, though, is the use of this story by Friedrich Engels, the partner of Karl Marx. Engels had a deep interest in early Christianity as a social movement. Although he was a deadly enemy of the churches, he respected early Christianity as an authentic voice of the poor, before it was co-opted by the state and the institutional church.

Engwels-in-later-life

In the 1890s, he used the story of Peregrinus to frame that early situation. Remarkably, he was not using Lucian to depict Christians as fools, and he drew quite startling parallels between those early believers and the radical Left of his own day. In both eras, he says, there were dedicated activists for the poor, but if they were not careful, they tended to slide off into hare-brained schemes, and to fall for the cynical manipulation of deceivers, tricksters, con-men and what we might call cult-leaders (and yes, I know I am using the word “cynical” in its popular sense there).

In both eras, con-men could go a long way before being found out. A little apocalyptic preaching went a long way. It even helped when people began to find out what you were up to, as it was easy enough to dismiss charges against you as the result of the lying plots of an evil world. And as the radical movement developed, so it attracted flaky eccentrics who pinned their particular causes on the true doctrine of the mainstream movement.

Engels’s attitude to the early church fooled by Peregrinus is a sympathetic “Oh my, you also had to deal with rogues like that even way back then?” Engels himself can remember meeting people like Peregrinus in the leftist underground of nineteenth century Europe, which had plenty of would-be prophets and messiahs.

Friedrich Engels made no claims to be fair and balanced on this or any topic, but his account does ring true for the developmental stages of many new and emerging religious movements.

You can read Engels’s account in full, but let me offer an excerpt here. Engels writes:

[Lucian] relates among other things the life-story of a certain adventurous Peregrinus, Proteus by name, from Parium in Hellespontus. When a youth, this Peregrinus made his début in Armenia by committing fornication. He was caught in the act and [nearly] lynched according to the custom of the country. He was fortunate enough to escape and after strangling his father in Parium he had to flee.

“And so it happened … that he also came to hear of the astonishing learning of the Christians, with whose priests and scribes he had cultivated intercourse in Palestine. He made such progress in a short time that his teachers were like children compared with him. He became a prophet, an elder, a master of the synagogue, in a word, all in everything. He interpreted their writings and himself wrote a great number of works, so that finally people saw in him a superior being, let him lay down laws for them and made him their overseer (bishop) …. On that ground (i.e., because he was a Christian) Proteus was at length arrested by the authorities and thrown into prison….

“As he thus lay in chains, the Christians, who saw in his capture a great misfortune, made all possible attempts to free him. But they did not succeed. Then they administered to him in all possible ways with the greatest solicitude. As early as daybreak one could see aged mothers, widows and young orphans crowding at the door of his prison; the most prominent among the Christians even bribed the warders and spent whole nights with him; they took their meals with them and read their holy books in his presence; briefly, the beloved Peregrinus” (he still went by that name) “was no less to them than a new Socrates. Envoys of Christian communities came to him even from towns in Asia Minor to lend him a helping hand, to console him and to testify in his favor in court.

“It is unbelievable how quick these people are to act whenever it is a question of their community; they immediately spare neither exertion nor expense. And thus from all sides money then poured in to Peregrinus so that his imprisonment became for him a source of great income. For the poor people persuaded themselves that they were immortal in body and in soul and that they would live for all eternity; that was why, they scorned death and many of them even voluntarily written by his sacrificed their lives. Then their most prominent lawgiver convinced them that they would all be brothers one to another once they were converted, i.e., renounced the Greek gods, professed faith in the crucified sophist and lived according to his prescriptions. That is why they despise all material goods without distinction and own them in common — doctrines which they have accepted in good faith, without demonstration or proof. And when a skilful imposter who knows how to make clever use of circumstances comes to them he can manage to get rich in a short time and laugh up his sleeve over these simpletons. For the rest, Peregrinus was set free by him who was then prefect of Syria.”

Then, after a few more adventures,

“Our worthy set forth a second time” (from Parium) “on his peregrinations, the Christians’ good disposition standing him in lieu of money for his journey: they administered to his needs everywhere and never let him suffer want. He was fed for a time in this way. But then, when he violated the laws of the Christians too — I think he was caught eating of some forbidden food — they excommunicated him from their community.”

Engels then offers his own interpretations, from his own time, where he finds lots of parallel cases:

What memories of youth come to my mind as I read this passage from Lucian! First of all the “prophet Albrecht” who from about 1840 literally plundered the Weitling communist communities in Switzerland for several years — a tall powerful man with a long beard who wandered on foot through Switzerland and gathered audiences for his mysterious new Gospel of world emancipation, but who, after all, seems to have been a tolerably harmless hoaxer and soon died.

Then his not so harmless successor, “the doctor” Georg Kuhlmann from Holstein, who put to profit the time when Weitling was in prison to convert the communities of French Switzerland to his own Gospel, and for a time with such success that he even caught August Becker, by far the cleverest but also the biggest ne’er-do-well among them. This Kuhlmann used to deliver lectures to them which were published in Geneva in 1845 under the title The New World, or the Kingdom of the Spirit on Earth: Proclamation. In the introduction, supporters (probably August Becker) we read

“What was needed was a man on whose lips all our sufferings and all our longings and hopes, in a word, all that affects our time most profoundly should find expression …. This man, whom our time was waiting for, has come. He is the doctor Georg Kuhlmann from Holstein He has come forward with the doctrine of the new world or the kingdom of the spirit in reality”

I hardly need to add that this doctrine of the new world is nothing more than the most vulgar sentimental nonsense rendered in half-biblical expressions a la Lamennais and declaimed with prophet-like arrogance. But this did not prevent the good Weitlingers from carrying the swindler shoulder-high as the Asian Christians once did Peregrinus. They who were otherwise arch-democrats and extreme equalitarians to the extent of fostering ineradicable suspicion against any schoolmaster, journalist, and any man generally who was not a manual worker as being an “erudite” who was out to exploit them, let themselves be persuaded by the melodramatically arrayed Kuhlman that in the “New World” it would be the wisest of all, id est, Kuhlmann, who would regulate the distribution of pleasures and that therefore, even then, in the Old World, the disciples ought to bring pleasures by the bushel to that same wisest of all while they themselves should be content with crumbs.

So Peregrinus Kuhlmann lived a splendid life of pleasure at the expense of the community — as long as it lasted. It did not last very long, of course; the growing murmurs of doubters and unbelievers and the menace of persecution by the Vaudois Government put an end to the “Kingdom of the Spirit” in Lausanne — Kuhlmann disappeared.

Incidentally, this is a classic portrait of a nineteenth century messianic cult leader, the main novelty being that this is in Europe. That sort of character is much more familiar to us from the American situation. If you read German, there’s a detailed account of Kuhlmann’s career here.

Engels continues:

Everybody who has known by experience the European working-class movement in its beginnings will remember dozens of similar examples.

Today such extreme cases, at least in the large centers, have become impossible; but in remote districts where the movement has won new ground a small Peregrinus of this kind can still count on a temporary limited success. And just as all those who have nothing to look forward to from the official world or have come to the end of their tether with it — opponents of inoculation, supporters of abstemiousness, vegetarians, anti-vivisectionists, nature-healers, free-community preachers whose communities have fallen to pieces, authors of new theories on the origin of the universe, unsuccessful or unfortunate inventors, victims of real or imaginary injustice who are termed “good-for-nothing pettifoggers” by all bureaucracy, honest fools and dishonest swindlers — all throng to the working-class parties in all countries — so it was with the first Christians.

All the elements which had been set free, i.e., at a loose end, by the dissolution of the old world came one after the other into the orbit of Christianity as the only element that resisted that process of dissolution — for the very reason that it was the necessary product of that process — and that therefore persisted and grew while the other elements were but ephemeral flies. There was no fanaticism, no foolishness, no scheming that did not flock to the young Christian communities and did not at least for a time and in isolated places find attentive ears and willing believers.

Yes, it’s a very hostile source – but some historians of the chaotic Early Christian world of the second and third centuries might agree.

 

 

 

 

 

 

"Who says we are a secular nation? You and atheists? Where did you get that? ..."

Evangelical Silence and Trump: A Reformation ..."
"Personal attack. Once you run out of reason fuel and facts, you engage in personal ..."

Evangelical Silence and Trump: A Reformation ..."
">>>"Read your responses to my comment and see whom is truly the one making 'personal ..."

Evangelical Silence and Trump: A Reformation ..."

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!


What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment
  • Andrew Dowling

    Great and interesting post. By chance I was reading Lucian’s “tale” just the other week . . .I’ve found early pagan sources on Christianity, despite their hostility, to be very extremely interesting.

  • James Stagg

    “before it was co-opted by the state and the institutional church.” Are these your words, Mr. Jenkins, or those of Engels?

    Then we have: ” the pagan satirist Lucian wrote the story of one Peregrinus, who died in the 160s. (He burned himself alive).” I believe this was a story, Mr. Jenkins, not a history. Please google “Lucien of Samosata (pdf)”.
    Even you describe it as a satire.

    So Engels liked “stories”. Reminds me much of at least two “modern religions” founded on science-fiction. Not much connected to Christianity, though, even the “co-opted” type.

    Lots of quotes, lots of words, but they don’t say much.

  • philipjenkins

    Peregrinus was a historical character, whether or not he attracted stories and satires. As you can find easily enough, other contemporaries describe his career, and he is the subject of work by modern historians, including a biography.

    Obviously, the phrase you use was my summary of Engels’ comment.

    And my point remains, that Engels actually makes some acute comments on second century Christianity. Seems important enough to me.

  • James Stagg

    Point made, Mr. Jenkins. about his apparent existence. Which part of this extract from Wikipedia covers his life with Christians?

    Modern reconstructions

    Several modern historians have attempted to outline Peregrinus’ life using the works of Lucian and other sources that have fixed historical dates such as the completion of Herodes Atticus’ aqueduct and the Jewish revolt in Syria. One of the more complete timelines of Peregrinus Proteus’ life comes from Gilbert Bagnani. His timeline for Peregrinus’ life goes like so:

    ca. 95 birth at Parium

    114-116 in Armenia
    ca. 120 at Parium: death of his father
    120-130 goes to Palestine and Syria: joins Essene-Ebionite Church at Pella
    132 imprisoned on the outbreak of the Jewish revolt
    134 released by Julius Severus
    135 after his return to Parium resumes his travels
    ca. 140 excommunicated as an Ebionite: goes to Egypt
    ca. 150 goes to Rome
    ca. 152 expelled from Rome
    153 attacks Herodes Atticus at Olympia
    157 is reconciled to Herodes
    165 his death at Olympia [17]

    The Essene-Ebionite group appears to be a Hebrew sect, not Christian, since they denied the divinity of the Christ and considered Saul/Paul to be an apostate. A rather “odd” group of “Christians”.

  • philipjenkins

    The ebionites were well known as a jewish-Christian sect, and are always so discussed in accounts of the early church.

  • philipjenkins

    And “Odd” perhaps by later standards, but the early Christian movement was very diverse in its theologies. By the way, one common explanation for the ebionites was that they were the remnants of the original Jewish followers of Jesus, including the bulk of the Jerusalem church, who never accepted Paul’s innovations.