Relation of Baptism to Baptism of Desire

Relation of Baptism to Baptism of Desire October 18, 2016


The Good Thief on the Cross, by Jacopo Bassano (1510-1592) [public domain / Wikimedia Commons]




A certain Protestant objection is made that Catholics make baptism necessary for salvation, so that if someone doesn’t receive baptism they are necessarily damned, and that this is the Council of Trent’s teaching (Canons on the Sacrament of Baptism). The Catholic replies that baptism is the normative means of regeneration; however, in extraordinary cases, baptism of desire may suffice, and a person could be saved. St. Thomas Aquinas talks about this at great length.

A Protestant might ask about the difference between baptism of desire and trusting Christ alone for salvation. The answer is “not much.” For example, a man could know he is about to be killed, acknowledge Jesus Christ as Lord and Savior and Redeemer in that moment and die a saved man. Only God knows all the factors involved. But it is altogether possible.

The key word above is “could.” That doesn’t mean that it is the normative process if one has time to be obedient to biblical commands, etc. (which include being baptized for the forgiveness of sins and regeneration). The anathemas of Trent regarding denial of baptism as a necessity for regeneration and salvation presuppose that one is able to be baptized.

In some situations (such as the hypothetical above of the man about to be killed) that is not possible. The Catholic Church does not teach that he would be damned simply because he didn’t have time for someone to spit on him in the name of the Trinity (i.e., to produce “water” immediately in an emergency situation) and baptize him. Let’s not get ridiculous . . .

But if a Catholic points out that the Church allows for baptism of desire in this case and others, then some will accuse the Catholic of denying the authority of Trent, or say that it is an individualized reading of that council, that can be dismissed! This is sheer nonsense, because in the canons concerning “On the Sacraments in General”, right before the canons on baptism, from Session VII, we find Canon IV:

If any one saith, that the sacraments of the New Law are not necessary unto salvation, but superfluous; and that, without them, or without the desire thereof, men obtain of God, through faith alone, the grace of justification;-though all (the sacraments) are not indeed necessary for every individual; let him be anathema.

This is baptism of desire, explicitly sanctioned by Trent. Case closed . . .


Meta Description: Baptism of desire doesn’t wipe out the “normative” necessity for baptism.

Meta Keywords: Baptism, baptismal regeneration, baptism of desire, original sin, sacraments, sacramentalism

"I have said this before on other sites - Francis wants us to live our ..."

How Dare Pope Francis Defend the ..."
"I think Jesus would get the vaccine - assuming the “science” is right.My personal doubts ..."

“Would Jesus Get Vaccinated?”: Reply to ..."
"If Mr. Enwegner is trying to say that Peter is Christ's brother, then he is ..."

Jesus’ “Brothers” (Not Siblings) 0101: vs. ..."

Browse Our Archives