Fathers of the Church (Index Page)

 Fathers6

Four doctors of the Church: left to right: St. Augustine, Pope St. Gregory the Great, St. Jerome, and St. Ambrose (1516), by Pier Francesco Sacchi (c. 1485–1528) [pubic domain / Wikimedia Commons]

*****
Asterisked posts are from Internet Archive, from old Blogspot papers. Allow a minute or two for them to upload and select versions from July 2015 or earlier.
***

MY THREE BOOKS ON THE CHURCH FATHERS

*
*
*
GENERAL AND MISCELLANEOUS
*
*
*
*
PROTESTANTISM AND THE FATHERS 
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
ST. AUGUSTINE
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Purgatory: Refutation of James White (1 Corinthians 3:10-15)  (includes lengthy citations of St. Augustine) [3-3-07]
*
*
*
Introduction to The Quotable Augustine (edited by Dave Armstrong) [8-9-12]
*
*
*
*
*
BAPTISM AND BAPTISMAL REGENERATION
*
*
*
BIBLE / TRADITION / CHURCH / APOSTOLIC SUCCESSION / RULE OF FAITH
*
*
Dialogue on “Perspicuous Apostolic Teaching” (vs. James White) [May-June 1996]
*
*
*
*
Debate: Church Fathers & Sola Scriptura (vs. Jason Engwer) [8-1-03]
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Chrysostom & Irenaeus: Sola Scripturists? (vs. David T. King) [4-20-07]

Antidote to William Whitaker’s Sola Scriptura Arguments, Part 2: Views of Tertullian, St. John Chrysostom, and St. Augustine / St. Athanasius on the Old Testament Canon [9-5-11] *

Antidote to William Whitaker’s Sola Scriptura Arguments: Church Fathers on the Rule of Faith / Prooftext for Perspicuity (Eisegesis of Deuteronomy 30:11-14) Refuted from Scripture [9-14-11] *

Antidote to William Whitaker’s Sola Scriptura Arguments: Church Councils, St. Irenaeus’ Rule of Faith, and St. John Chrysostom on St. Peter and His Successors [9-26-11] *

Antidote to William Whitaker’s Sola Scriptura Arguments, Part 14: The Nature of Tradition(s), the Immaculate Conception; Gregory the Great and Nicaea II on Images [9-27-11] *

Dialogue with a Lutheran: Church Fathers & Sola Scriptura (vs. Nathan Rinne) [10-13-11]

Dialogue with a Lutheran: Rule of Faith / Fathers / Ecclesiology (vs. Nathan Rinne) [10-17-11]

Reply to William Whitaker’s Sola Scriptura Arguments (Absurd Alleged Biblical Indications Against Apostolic Tradition) [10-20-11]

Antidote to William Whitaker’s Sola Scriptura Arguments: Oral Tradition / Anti-Traditional Exegesis / St. John Chrysostom on Tradition [10-19-11] *

*

*

Church Fathers and Sola Scriptura [originally July 2003; somewhat modified condensation: 4-5-17]

*

Sola Scriptura, Cyril of Jerusalem, Logic, & Anti-Catholics [11-9-17]
*

CANON OF SCRIPTURE / DEUTEROCANONICAL BOOKS

*
*
*
*
*
*
*
CHRISTOLOGY / HOLY TRINITY / GOD THE FATHER
 
*
A Catholic-Orthodox Dialogue on Filioque (William Klimon) [July 1997] *
*
*
*
*
CHURCH / ECCLESIOLOGY
*
*
*
Bishops in the Apostolic Church [1-16-01; rev. 5-7-03]
*

Lutheran-Catholic Group Dialogue #2: The Nature of the True Church and Authoritative Christian Tradition / Questions on Institutional Separation [10-9-07] *

*
CONTRACEPTION

Contraception: Early Church Teaching (William Klimon) [1998] *
*

DEVELOPMENT OF DOCTRINE
EUCHARIST AND SACRIFICE OF THE MASS

*

St. Augustine’s Belief in the Real Presence [1996] *

History of the Doctrine of the Eucharist: Nine Protestant Scholarly Sources [12-1-96] *

John Calvin and St. Cyril of Jerusalem: Comparative Eucharistic Theology [6-14-04]

Eucharistic Sacrifice: The Witness of the Church Fathers [9-12-05]

Sacrifice of the Mass: Reflections on Theology & Patristics [9-22-05]

Church Fathers and the Sacrifice of the Mass (Thoroughly Catholic!) [12-11-09]

St. Augustine’s Eucharistic Doctrine and Protestant “Co-Opting” [9-25-10]

St. Augustine’s Eucharistic Doctrine: Simultaneous Assertion of Realism and Symbolism [2-17-11]

What Saint Augustine, Bishop, Saint and Doctor of the Catholic Church Actually Held Pertaining to Transubstantiation: A Response to Turretinfan (+ Part Two) [Paul Hoffer, 8-20-11]

Eucharist, Mass, & Church Fathers (Series) [compiled on 4-1-16]

 

LITURGY

Apologia for the New (Pauline) Mass: With Massive Traditional Documentation, Over Against its Detractors / Summary of Vatican II on Liturgical Reform [6-18-08]

St. Augustine’s Holy Communion [2012]

Communion in the Hand, Standing (Norm till 500-900 AD) [9-3-15]

MARRIAGE, DIVORCE, AND ANNULMENTS

*

Dialogue: Annulment vs. Divorce (with William Klimon) [1997-1999] *

MARY, THE BLESSED VIRGIN
*
*
*
*
*
PAPACY AND INFALLIBILITY
*
Pope St. Leo the Great, the “Robber” Council of 449, and the Council of Chalcedon in 451 (Blessed John Henry Cardinal Newman) [1993; re-posted to Facebook on 1-27-17]
*
*
The Development of the Papacy (Blessed John Henry Cardinal Newman) [1997; re-posted to Facebook on 1-27-17]
*
*
*
*
*
Purgatory: Refutation of James White (1 Corinthians 3:10-15)  (includes lengthy citations of St. Augustine) [3-3-07]
*
*
SALVATION AND SOTERIOLOGY
*
*
*
*
*
*
Origen (c. 185 – c. 254 ) on Faith, Works, and Judgment [2-27-08; re-posted to Facebook on 1-27-17]
*
*
*
SCIENCE

*
"I always appreciate any plugs and advertising. Thanks! No need to ask. A blessed Thanksgiving ..."

Catholic Ecumenism + Apologetics (James Swan’s ..."
"Marie's main point was "where does this impulse to be good COME from?""

Replies to the Problem of Evil ..."
"Why would it make no sense for anyone to behave with goodness, kindness, etc etc ..."

Replies to the Problem of Evil ..."

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!


What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment
  • https://www.blogger.com/profile/16294571008244780190 Ken Sponburg

    Dave,

    Could you write something on how to respond to Protestants that ask why we should listen to the Church Fathers (why they are so important) and also the fundamentalists who reject the Church Fathers and call them heretics (i.e. David Cloud etc.)? I would love to read an article about that.

  • https://www.blogger.com/profile/07771661758539438173 Dave Armstrong

    I've written about that in various places: various aspects of it.

    I think it comes down to the discussion of authority and sola Scriptura. The Catholic has to show how and why SS is false, in order to convince the SS proponent that he is in error. I've done that in two of my books (and a good chunk of a third, and smaller parts of several others).

    Once that's done, then the fathers are appreciated as part of the history of the Church and apostolic tradition, because Church and tradition are now accepted as authoritative as well.