2019-05-14T14:42:03-04:00

In 2005 I wrote the fairly exhaustive article, Luther’s “Snow-Covered Dunghill” (Myth?). I could not find conclusive evidence that Martin Luther had ever used this phrase; although I thought I found all the basic component ideas present in Luther. I was curious to see if anyone else had come up with anything since that time. Apparently not, and it seems that my paper remains the most in-depth treatment of the question online. It may be that I have found, today,... Read more

2019-05-13T13:35:57-04:00

[from my 2013 book, pictured above (see purchase & general information); available in Spanish and French as well), except that I have provided all the passages in RSV (the book was mostly KJV)] ***** Salvation is Ultimately by Grace Alone Where does it state that we are saved by grace alone? 2 Timothy 1:9 who saved us and called us with a holy calling, not in virtue of our works but in virtue of his own purpose and the grace... Read more

2019-05-13T11:55:58-04:00

[from my 2004 book, pictured above (see purchase and other information), pp.  97-102] ***** Acts 16:15 (RSV) “And when she was baptized, with her household, she besought us, saying, ‘If you have judged me to be faithful to the Lord, come to my house and stay.’ And she prevailed upon us” [cf. 18:18]. Acts 16:33 “And he took them the same hour of the night, and washed their wounds, and he was baptized at once, with all his family.” 1 Corinthians 1:16 “I... Read more

2019-05-10T14:51:58-04:00

Let’s cut to the quick. The bottom-line questions at hand are: 1) Is Pope Francis a heretic, or demonstrably guilty of espousing or promulgating specific heretical tenets? 2) On what canonical / theological basis does one incontrovertibly establish this charge? Even a reactionary signatory to the Easter Letter like Dr. Peter Kwasniewski (one of 13 out of 19 documented original signatories with strong reactionary leanings) will go part of the way in acknowledging that there is an honest, legitimate case... Read more

2019-05-09T13:12:28-04:00

That is, Ones Not Specifically Related to Pope Francis: Especially Vatican II as the Big Bad Wolf Some folks don’t like to read much and/or prefer to get right down to brass tacks. My original post on this topic was 2991 words long. This will be a lot shorter (only 628 words). For further documentation, see the original. Do these critics speak for you?   1) Fr. Thomas Crean doesn’t like Pope St. John Paul II, and opposed his canonization. He... Read more

2019-05-09T11:07:41-04:00

I only wished to show, by the way, what kind of monks the early Church had, and what the monastic profession then was, that from the contrast sound readers might judge how great the effrontery is of those who allege antiquity in support of present monkism. Augustine, while tracing out a holy and legitimate monasticism, . . . (Institutes of the Christian Religion, Book IV, 13:10) Observe how Calvin described ancient monasticism as “holy and legitimate.” Why, then, doesn’t he... Read more

2019-05-09T11:01:38-04:00

Philip Melanchthon (1497-1560) was Martin Luther’s best friend and successor as the leader of early Lutheranism. I made the following comment: As for Melanchthon’s “complexity”: yes, he sure was: a mild-mannered humanist who was too much of a wimp to even stand up to his friend Luther, yet who was in favor of killing peaceful Anabaptists, those who rejected the Real Presence of Christ in the Eucharist (the very belief that he himself later came to hold!), and those who held... Read more

2019-05-08T13:06:30-04:00

1. He vigorously defended the use of the title Theotokos [“Mother of God”] 2. He believed in Mary’s perpetual virginity (including in partu: that is, — without getting graphic about it — a virgin during birth: Jesus miraculously passing through her body to be delivered). 3. He held to a form of Immaculate Conception: thinking Mary was freed from original sin: but at the conception of Christ, not her own. 4. He (and early Lutheran confessions) held that a person... Read more

2019-05-08T12:27:58-04:00

I looked through virtually every reference to deuterocanonical citations in the Index to Luther’s Works (vol. 55 — I have the entire set in hardcover) and found a few other things on my own. Luther cites as “Scripture” Ecclesiasticus (or Sirach) twelve times, referencing as many different passages. He cites Wisdom of Solomon in this way five times. He calls 1 Maccabees “Scripture” twice, and virtually equates the book of Judith with Scripture, saying that its words are to “be understood... Read more

Follow Us!



Browse Our Archives