Papacy & Papal Infallibility: Classic Catholic Reflections

October 24, 2018 By Dave Armstrong

1. The Church’s Developing Understanding of Infallibility A. Papal Primacy and the Universal Church (Catholic Statement) “We believe that the New Testament is given to us not as a finished body of doctrine but as an expression of the developing faith and institutionalization of the church in the first century. “In many respects the New Testament and the doctrines it contains are complemented by subsequent developments in the faith and life of the church. For example, the statements of faith in the... Read more

Resisting Heretic Popes: Classic Catholic Reflections

October 24, 2018 By Dave Armstrong

The notion of popes possibly being heretics (and what to do in that eventuality) is nothing new or alarming. For example, John Chapman, a prominent Catholic writer and defender of the papacy, writing in the 1913 Catholic Encyclopedia article “Pope Honorius I” — though he denies that Honorius violated papal infallibility because he did not make an erroneous ex cathedra proclamation –, states outright (my emphasis): Hefele, with many others before and after him, held that Leo II by the same words explained the sense in... Read more

Seidensticker Folly #28: Lies About Bible “Contradictions”

October 23, 2018 By Dave Armstrong

1. Christians don’t sin? 2. Universalism? 3. “Tomb evangelism”. 4. Can human beings see God or not? Atheist and anti-theist Bob Seidensticker, who was “raised Presbyterian”, runs the influential Cross Examined blog. He asked me there, on 8-11-18: “I’ve got 1000+ posts here attacking your worldview. You just going to let that stand? Or could you present a helpful new perspective that I’ve ignored on one or two of those posts?” He also made a general statement on 6-22-17: “Christians’ arguments are easy to refute . . . I’ve heard... Read more

Development of Sacrifice of the Mass: Dialogue w Lutheran

October 23, 2018 By Dave Armstrong

“CPA” attends the Lutheran Church — Missouri Synod (LCMS). He is a Professor of Mongolian Studies. His words will be in blue. * * * * * Dave, you’ve misunderstood my project and failed to draw a number of key distinctions (ones drawn by both the Apology of the Augsburg Confession AND post-Tridentine scholastics). What I am trying to do is NOT to “dispute” that “sacrifice was indeed a prominent motif in the fathers”. Instead I accept that fact, but argue... Read more

Transubstantiation & Church History: Dialogue w Lutheran

October 23, 2018 By Dave Armstrong

“CPA” was an adult convert; he was baptized on Easter 1994 and attends the Lutheran Church — Missouri Synod (LCMS). He is a Professor of Mongolian Studies. His words will be in blue. * * * * * [You rely] on crucial ambiguities as to what “Transubstantiation” as a doctrine actually is. You presuppose that I am always referring to transubstantiation, when I am not necessarily doing so. At some points, you use it simply as 1) a synonym for “Real Presence”... Read more

Dialogue on Calvin’s & Patristic Eucharistic Theology

October 22, 2018 By Dave Armstrong

. . . Especially St. Cyril of Jerusalem’s Theology of the Eucharist My two dialogue opponents are Reformed Protestant (Calvinist). Dr. Joel Garver‘s words will be in blue; Kevin Johnson’s in green. See the related paper, from five days earlier: John Calvin and St. Cyril of Jerusalem: Comparative Eucharistic Theology. Reference is made to it below. ***** I would like to particularly thank Joel for replying (though also Kevin, of course); I know he must be a very busy man (like all academics)... Read more

“Unanimous Consent” of Church Fathers: Not Literally All

October 22, 2018 By Dave Armstrong

Does the Phrase “Unanimous Consent of the Fathers” Allow Any Exceptions? The term “unanimous consent” — as used in an ecclesiological / patristic context –, does not mean “absolutely every” — as it is commonly used today in general usage, but rather, “consensus of the vast majority” in line with the magisterium of the Church. See a short paper by Catholic apologist Steve Ray that explains this. Many critics of the Catholic Church question this meaning, and think we are playing games and special... Read more

Dialogue w Lutheran Pastor on Bible & Sola Scriptura

October 19, 2018 By Dave Armstrong

(including St. Irenaeus’ View on the Rule of Faith) Rev. Dr. Eric G. Phillips (LCMS) replied to my post, Lutheran Chemnitz Wrong Re Fathers & Sola Scriptura (mostly dealing with St. Irenaeus and Tertullian) on my public Facebook page. We discussed St. Irenaeus’ views and the alleged biblical support for sola Scriptura (which I contend is non-existent). His words will be in blue. ***** Response to the first third of that, because I don’t have time to read (let alone respond... Read more

Lutheran Chemnitz: Errors Re Fathers & Sola Scriptura

October 18, 2018 By Dave Armstrong

— including analysis of Jerome, Augustine, Origen, Epiphanius, Ambrose, Lactantius, Athanasius, and Cyprian — This is a reply to this aspect of the prominent 16th century Lutheran theologian Martin Chemnitz’ Examination of the Council of Trent, Part I (St. Louis: Concordia Pub. House, 1971; translated by Fred Kramer). It’s basically a follow-up to the previous installment, which dealt primarily with the views of St. Irenaeus and Tertullian. * * * * * Before proceeding, I need to make a very important clarification that always... Read more

Lutheran Chemnitz Wrong Re Fathers & Sola Scriptura

October 18, 2018 By Dave Armstrong

— mostly dealing with St. Irenaeus and Tertullian — This is a reply to one aspect of the prominent 16th century Lutheran theologian Martin Chemnitz’ Examination of the Council of Trent, Part I (St. Louis: Concordia Pub. House, 1971; translated by Fred Kramer). I’m in possession of a hardcover edition. * * * * * I read the first hundred pages of Chemnitz’ Examen, Volume I. Now I’ve read the entire section on Bible and Tradition (minus the sections on canonicity and vernacular,... Read more