Worshiping God Through Images (vs. Anglican Stearns #4)

Last updated on: March 20, 2025 at 10:37 am By Dave Armstrong

Including the Biblical Case for Icons Edward Josiah Stearns (1810-1890) was an Episcopal clergyman from Maryland and author of several books. His volume, The Faith of Our Forefathers (New York: Thomas Whittaker, 1879), was a reply to The Faith of Our Fathers (1876), by James Cardinal Gibbons (1834-1921), one of the best and most well-known Catholic apologetics works, with an emphasis on scriptural arguments and replies to Protestant critiques of Catholicism. It had sold over 1.4 million copies by the time of its 83rd edition in 1917 and was... Read more

No Particular Judgment? (vs. Anglican Stearns #3)

Last updated on: March 17, 2025 at 4:10 pm By Dave Armstrong

0 Comments

Including a Brief Examination of the Views of the Church Fathers Edward Josiah Stearns (1810-1890) was an Episcopal clergyman from Maryland and author of several books. His volume, The Faith of Our Forefathers (New York: Thomas Whittaker, 1879), was a reply to The Faith of Our Fathers (1876), by James Cardinal Gibbons (1834-1921), one of the best and most well-known Catholic apologetics works, with an emphasis on scriptural arguments and replies to Protestant critiques of Catholicism. It had sold over 1.4 million copies by the time of its... Read more

Was St. Paul Still a Pharisee After His Conversion?

Last updated on: March 15, 2025 at 1:18 pm By Dave Armstrong

0 Comments

This came about in an exchange with (I think) a Lutheran; some sort of Protestant, at any rate, in a Protestant venue. ***** The Pharisees are usually regarded by Christians of all stripes as the “bad guys” in the New Testament. In many respects they were. But they remained the mainstream Jewish tradition, and they accepted the view that Moses received oral tradition from God on Mt. Sinai in addition to the written law, and many other theological views that... Read more

Is Scripture Totally Clear? (vs. Anglican Stearns #2)

Last updated on: March 13, 2025 at 10:54 am By Dave Armstrong

0 Comments

+ the Church Fathers (Especially St. Augustine) on the Question of the Perspicuity (Clearness in the Main) of Scripture Edward Josiah Stearns (1810-1890) was an Episcopal clergyman from Maryland and author of several books. His volume, The Faith of Our Forefathers (New York: Thomas Whittaker, 1879), was a reply to The Faith of Our Fathers (1876), by James Cardinal Gibbons (1834-1921), one of the best and most well-known Catholic apologetics works, with an emphasis on scriptural arguments and replies to Protestant critiques of Catholicism. It had sold over... Read more

Infallible Church Authority (vs. Anglican Stearns #1)

Last updated on: March 11, 2025 at 2:39 pm By Dave Armstrong

0 Comments

Particularly With Regard to Being Led by the Holy Spirit Edward Josiah Stearns (1810-1890) was an Episcopal clergyman from Maryland and author of several books. His volume, The Faith of Our Forefathers (New York: Thomas Whittaker, 1879), was a reply to The Faith of Our Fathers (1876), by James Cardinal Gibbons (1834-1921), one of the best and most well-known Catholic apologetics works, with an emphasis on scriptural arguments and replies to Protestant critiques of Catholicism. It had sold over 1.4... Read more

The James White St. Ignatius of Antioch Controversy

Last updated on: March 7, 2025 at 3:34 pm By Dave Armstrong

0 Comments

“Yes, Virginia, There Was a St. Ignatius of Antioch” This came about after his recent debate with Joe Heschmeyer regarding whether the Catholic Mass is propitiatory. During one of the cross-examination periods, Bishop “Dr.” [???] James White (see my large web page devoted to him and also my long 2013 book, Debating James White: Shocking Failures of the “Undefeatable” Anti-Catholic Champion) mentioned in passing that in contemporary scholarship, there is a movement that denies the historical existence of St. Ignatius... Read more

The Sacrifice of the Mass in Hebrews & Revelation

Last updated on: March 6, 2025 at 8:25 pm By Dave Armstrong

0 Comments

I’m inspired by the fabulous performance of Catholic Answers apologist Joe Heschmeyer vs. Bishop “Dr.” [???] James White in the recent debate, “Is the Mass A Propitiatory Sacrifice?” Joe pointed out how Protestants look the death of the Jesus on the cross as a one-time event (as indeed it was), but in a way that precludes a revisiting of it in the Mass. But then he noted how there was a difference in the Old Testament sacrificial system between the... Read more

Reply to François Turretin #14: Eucharist, Pt. 2

Last updated on: March 1, 2025 at 3:11 pm By Dave Armstrong

0 Comments

False premises; unfounded, unbiblical divine “impossibilities”; cessationism; ten types of physical divine presence François Turretin (1623-1687) was a Genevan-Italian Reformed scholastic theologian and renowned defender of the Calvinistic (Reformed) orthodoxy represented by the Synod of Dort, and was one of the authors of the Helvetic Consensus (1675). He is generally considered to be the best Calvinist apologist besides John Calvin himself. His Institutes of Elenctic Theology (three volumes, Geneva, 1679–1685) used the scholastic method. “Elenctic” means “refuting an argument by proving the falsehood of its conclusion.” Turretin contended against the conflicting Christian perspectives of Catholicism and Arminianism. It was a... Read more

Reply to François Turretin #13: Transubstantiation, Pt. 2

Last updated on: February 27, 2025 at 11:32 am By Dave Armstrong

0 Comments

Language of “bread” & “wine” after consecration; transubstantiation and transformation: compendium from the Church fathers François Turretin (1623-1687) was a Genevan-Italian Reformed scholastic theologian and renowned defender of the Calvinistic (Reformed) orthodoxy represented by the Synod of Dort, and was one of the authors of the Helvetic Consensus (1675). He is generally considered to be the best Calvinist apologist besides John Calvin himself. His Institutes of Elenctic Theology (three volumes, Geneva, 1679–1685) used the scholastic method. “Elenctic” means “refuting an argument by proving the falsehood of its conclusion.” Turretin contended against the conflicting Christian perspectives of Catholicism and Arminianism. It... Read more

Reply to François Turretin #12: Transubstantiation, Pt. 1

Last updated on: February 27, 2025 at 11:29 am By Dave Armstrong

0 Comments

Does Turretin think biblically in this regard or hyper-rationally and skeptically? François Turretin (1623-1687) was a Genevan-Italian Reformed scholastic theologian and renowned defender of the Calvinistic (Reformed) orthodoxy represented by the Synod of Dort, and was one of the authors of the Helvetic Consensus (1675). He is generally considered to be the best Calvinist apologist besides John Calvin himself. His Institutes of Elenctic Theology (three volumes, Geneva, 1679–1685) used the scholastic method. “Elenctic” means “refuting an argument by proving the falsehood of its conclusion.” Turretin contended against the conflicting Christian perspectives of Catholicism and Arminianism. It was a popular textbook;... Read more