The Sacrifice of the Mass in Hebrews & Revelation

The Sacrifice of the Mass in Hebrews & Revelation 2025-03-06T20:25:37-04:00

Photo credit: Adoration of the Mystic Lamb, detail of the Ghent Altarpiece, c. 1432, by Jan van Eyck (c. 1390-1441) [public domain / Wikimedia Commons]

I’m inspired by the fabulous performance of Catholic Answers apologist Joe Heschmeyer vs. Bishop “Dr.” [???] James White in the recent debate, “Is the Mass A Propitiatory Sacrifice?” Joe pointed out how Protestants look the death of the Jesus on the cross as a one-time event (as indeed it was), but in a way that precludes a revisiting of it in the Mass. But then he noted how there was a difference in the Old Testament sacrificial system between the sacrifice itself and the offering of the sacrifice to God (all of it being part of the same overall process of worship). On the Day of Atonement, known by Jews as Yom Kippur, we see the procedure of the sacrifice, according to Mosaic Law:

Leviticus 16:11-16 (RSV) “Aaron shall present the bull as a sin offering for himself, and shall make atonement for himself and for his house; he shall kill the bull as a sin offering for himself. [12] And he shall take a censer full of coals of fire from the altar before the LORD, and two handfuls of sweet incense beaten small; and he shall bring it within the veil [13] and put the incense on the fire before the LORD, that the cloud of the incense may cover the mercy seat which is upon the testimony, lest he die; [14] and he shall take some of the blood of the bull, and sprinkle it with his finger on the front of the mercy seat, and before the mercy seat he shall sprinkle the blood with his finger seven times. [15] “Then he shall kill the goat of the sin offering which is for the people, and bring its blood within the veil, and do with its blood as he did with the blood of the bull, sprinkling it upon the mercy seat and before the mercy seat; [16] thus he shall make atonement for the holy place, because of the uncleannesses of the people of Israel, and because of their transgressions, all their sins;

First, the sacrifice was made by the high priest, and then blood was taken from it (both from a bull and a goat) into the Holy of Holies (the holiest part — the inner sanctum — of the temple, and the tabernacle, prior to the temple) and sprinkled onto the mercy seat between the two cherubim, which was above the ark of the covenant, where God was specially present (Ex 30:6: “. . . the mercy seat that is over the testimony, where I will meet with you”). Hence, the second “offering” to God was separate and distinct from the sacrifice of the animals. Before God gave Moses the Law on Mt. Sinai, in Egypt, before the exodus, the feast of Passover was a simpler form of the same sort of sacrifice:

Exodus 12:5-8, 13-14 Your lamb shall be without blemish, a male a year old; you shall take it from the sheep or from the goats; [6] and you shall keep it until the fourteenth day of this month, when the whole assembly of the congregation of Israel shall kill their lambs in the evening. [7] Then they shall take some of the blood, and put it on the two doorposts and the lintel of the houses in which they eat them. [8] They shall eat the flesh that night, roasted; with unleavened bread and bitter herbs they shall eat it. . . . [13] The blood shall be a sign for you, upon the houses where you are; and when I see the blood, I will pass over you, and no plague shall fall upon you to destroy you, when I smite the land of Egypt. [14] “This day shall be for you a memorial day, and you shall keep it as a feast to the LORD; throughout your generations you shall observe it as an ordinance for ever.

The New Testament then picks up this theme and applies it to the redemptive sacrifice of Jesus on our behalf:

John 1:29, 36 The next day he saw Jesus coming toward him, and said, “Behold, the Lamb of God, who takes away the sin of the world! . . . [36] and he looked at Jesus as he walked, and said, “Behold, the Lamb of God!”

Acts 8:32 Now the passage of the scripture which he was reading was this: “As a sheep led to the slaughter or a lamb before its shearer is dumb,
so he opens not his mouth. [this was from the Old Testament passage below]

Isaiah 53:4-7 Surely he has borne our griefs and carried our sorrows; yet we esteemed him stricken, smitten by God, and afflicted. [5] But he was wounded for our transgressions, he was bruised for our iniquities; upon him was the chastisement that made us whole, and with his stripes we are healed. [6] All we like sheep have gone astray; we have turned every one to his own way; and the LORD has laid on him the iniquity of us all. [7] He was oppressed, and he was afflicted, yet he opened not his mouth; like a lamb that is led to the slaughter, and like a sheep that before its shearers is dumb, so he opened not his mouth.

1 Corinthians 5:7 . . . Christ, our paschal lamb, has been sacrificed.

1 Peter 1:19 . . . the precious blood of Christ, like that of a lamb without blemish or spot.

Let’s now look at relevant passages in the book of Hebrews, which discuss Jesus being the high priest of the new covenant:
Hebrews 2:17 Therefore he had to be made like his brethren in every respect, so that he might become a merciful and faithful high priest in the service of God, to make expiation for the sins of the people.
*
Hebrews 5:5-6 So also Christ did not exalt himself to be made a high priest, but was appointed by him who said to him, “Thou art my Son, today I have begotten thee”; [6] as he says also in another place, “Thou art a priest for ever, after the order of Melchiz’edek.” (cf. 6:20)
*
Hebrews 7:26-28 For it was fitting that we should have such a high priest, holy, blameless, unstained, separated from sinners, exalted above the heavens. [27] He has no need, like those high priests, to offer sacrifices daily, first for his own sins and then for those of the people; he did this once for all when he offered up himself. [28] Indeed, the law appoints men in their weakness as high priests, but the word of the oath, which came later than the law, appoints a Son who has been made perfect for ever.
*
Hebrews 9:11-14 But when Christ appeared as a high priest of the good things that have come, then through the greater and more perfect tent (not made with hands, that is, not of this creation) [12] he entered once for all into the Holy Place, taking not the blood of goats and calves but his own blood, thus securing an eternal redemption. [13] For if the sprinkling of defiled persons with the blood of goats and bulls and with the ashes of a heifer sanctifies for the purification of the flesh, [14] how much more shall the blood of Christ, who through the eternal Spirit offered himself without blemish to God, purify your conscience from dead works to serve the living God. [15] Therefore he is the mediator of a new covenant, so that those who are called may receive the promised eternal inheritance, since a death has occurred which redeems them from the transgressions under the first covenant.
*
Hebrews 9:24-26 For Christ has entered, not into a sanctuary made with hands, a copy of the true one, but into heaven itself, now to appear in the presence of God on our behalf. [25] Nor was it to offer himself repeatedly, as the high priest enters the Holy Place yearly with blood not his own; [26] for then he would have had to suffer repeatedly since the foundation of the world. But as it is, he has appeared once for all at the end of the age to put away sin by the sacrifice of himself.
*
Hebrews 10:10 . . . we have been sanctified through the offering of the body of Jesus Christ once for all.
The word “offer[ing]” appears 32 times in Hebrews; first regarding the Old Testament priests:
Hebrews 5:1, 3 For every high priest chosen from among men is appointed to act on behalf of men in relation to God, to offer gifts and sacrifices for sins. . . . [3] . . .  he is bound to offer sacrifice for his own sins as well as for those of the people.
*
Hebrews 8:3 . . . every high priest is appointed to offer gifts and sacrifices . . .
*
Hebrews 9:6-7 These preparations having thus been made, the priests go continually into the outer tent, performing their ritual duties; [7] but into the second only the high priest goes, and he but once a year, and not without taking blood which he offers for himself and for the errors of the people
But then the text moves to the climactic scene in heaven of Jesus offering His sacrifice to the Father:
Hebrews 10:11-14 And every priest stands daily at his service, offering repeatedly the same sacrifices, which can never take away sins. [12] But when Christ had offered for all time a single sacrifice for sins, he sat down at the right hand of God, [13] then to wait until his enemies should be made a stool for his feet. [14] For by a single offering he has perfected for all time those who are sanctified. (cf. 8:1: “we have such a high priest, one who is seated at the right hand of the throne”)
This brings me to my central argument, that was brought to mind by Joe Heschmeyer’s brilliant debate performance. One of the best arguments he made in the debate had to do with what the book of Hebrews presents with regard to Christ’s sacrifice and offering of Himself as the “paschal lamb” to the Father in heaven (Heb 10:11-14). This occurred at least 43 days after His crucifixion, because He spent time on the earth after His resurrection before He ascended to heaven (in order to sit down at the right hand of God once and for all).
*
In other words, there was an offering to the Father of the one sacrifice of Jesus on the cross for all time, that took place some six weeks after His death on the cross. Not everything was done at the time of the crucifixion (“it is finished”: Jn 19:30, therefore, could not have referred to this presentation in heaven) and there is a sense in which an ongoing sacrifice can be made present to us. The Catholic Mass is a re-presentation of the one sacrifice on the cross. It’s supernaturally made present to us, as I have written about:
*
What I’d like to now explore is perhaps a further instance of this argumentation regarding some sense of an ongoing sacrifice after the crucifixion. If we examine the book of Revelation, we find that the word “lamb” appears no less than 30 times, referring to Jesus 28 of those times. Dr. Scott Hahn wrote in his Catholic Answers article, “The Apocalyptic Mass” (9-1-00):

My most vivid memory of the first Mass I attended was that powerful moment in the Communion Rite where the people say, “Lamb of God, who takes away the sin of the world, have mercy on us.” “Lamb of God.” “Lamb of God.” Then they knelt, and the priest held up the host and said, “Behold the Lamb of God who takes away the sins of the world”—that was “Lamb of God” four times in less than a minute.

I was sitting in the back pew as simply an observer. But suddenly I knew where I was: I was back in the Book of Revelation where Jesus is called the Lamb of God no less than 28 times in 22 chapters. He’s only called “Lamb” in one other book in the entire New Testament: the Gospel of John, and there just twice. But in the Apocalypse, that’s his main title, more than all the other titles: Lord of Lords, King of Kings, Alpha and Omega, and all the rest. He’s the Lamb of God.

I went back to Mass the next day. I had my pad and pencil, and I had my Bible. This time I had it open to Revelation and I saw things I’d never seen before. I saw a connection in these liturgical actions. Not just one or two. Not even just eight or ten. I made a list of 30 elements: white-robed priests, an altar, a congregation chanting “Holy, holy, holy,” the alleluias, the amen, the golden chalices, the book, the invocation of angels and saints. I hardly knew which way to turn—toward the actions on the pages of the Apocalypse, or the action up at the altar. After about 15 or 20 minutes of the second Mass, suddenly I realized they were one and the same action. What I was reading on the page was exactly what I was watching up there at the altar.

We know what this is alluding to, if we are at all familiar with the Old Testament sacrificial system and the use of “lamb” and “high priest” in reference to Jesus: even going back to the famous messianic passage Isaiah 53. But what is striking is what Dr. Hahn noted: the constant use of “lamb” in the book of Revelation. And not only that, but specifically to a “lamb slain”:
Revelation 5:6-12 And between the throne and the four living creatures and among the elders, I saw a Lamb standing, as though it had been slain, with seven horns and with seven eyes, which are the seven spirits of God sent out into all the earth; [7] and he went and took the scroll from the right hand of him who was seated on the throne. [8] And when he had taken the scroll, the four living creatures and the twenty-four elders fell down before the Lamb, each holding a harp, and with golden bowls full of incense, which are the prayers of the saints; [9] and they sang a new song, saying, “Worthy art thou to take the scroll and to open its seals, for thou wast slain and by thy blood didst ransom men for God from every tribe and tongue and people and nation, [10] and hast made them a kingdom and priests to our God, and they shall reign on earth.” [11] Then I looked, and I heard around the throne and the living creatures and the elders the voice of many angels, numbering myriads of myriads and thousands of thousands, [12] saying with a loud voice, “Worthy is the Lamb who was slain, to receive power and wealth and wisdom and might and honor and glory and blessing!” (cf. 13:8: “the Lamb that was slain”; 7:14 and 12:11: “the blood of the Lamb”; 22:3: “the throne of God and of the Lamb shall be in it, and his servants shall worship him”)
Note that the worship in heaven is specifically directed towards Jesus, but not as the triumphant King Jesus; rather, it’s to the “Lamb” Who was “standing, as though it had been slain.” Again, there is an extraordinary connection to what we believe happens at Mass, where Jesus’ one sacrifice on the cross is supernaturally made present again and the priest and congregation take part in offering Jesus up (in the one sacrifice of the cross; not an additional sacrifice). And we partake of His Body and Blood, which was part of the OT sacrificial rituals as well.
*
What I would like to know from my Protestant brothers and sisters is: how does all this harmonize with the common Protestant disdain of Catholic crucifixes? Protestants generally have crosses, but minus the body of Jesus. They will point out that all of that is done and over with; that Jesus is now triumphant in heaven (“so why keep going back to the cross?”). Yet when we see what actually occurs in heaven — what the inspired Bible reveals to us –, we don’t find that state of affairs at all. We see the Lamb “slain” and worshiped as the slain lamb. There is no de-emphasis at all of the death of Christ. It is still present and very much front and center. Indeed, it’s like a “live crucifix.” So what becomes of all that rather common and annoying Protestant rhetoric against this crucial aspect of Christianity?
*
The most striking aspect of all of this — relevant to our doctrine of the Sacrifice of the Mass — is that it’s not merely occurring 43 days after the crucifixion (when Jesus offered Himself to God and sat down at His right hand). The evidence for the dating of the book of Revelation suggests a time at the end of the Roman emperor Domitian’s reign. He died in 96 AD. So if we follow that date, it’s about 66 years after the crucifixion of Christ. Yet even then St. John saw Jesus as a slain lamb, and witnessed Him being worshiped in heaven as such, too.
*
But he goes beyond that, still referring to Jesus as the “Lamb” during the time of the last days, the Second Coming and heaven after the end of the age, and even into eternity, that God allowed him to foresee:
Revelation 6:15-17 Then the kings of the earth and the great men and the generals and the rich and the strong, and every one, slave and free, hid in the caves and among the rocks of the mountains, [16] calling to the mountains and rocks, “Fall on us and hide us from the face of him who is seated on the throne, and from the wrath of the Lamb; [17] for the great day of their wrath has come, and who can stand before it?”
*
Revelation 14:1 Then I looked, and lo, on Mount Zion stood the Lamb, and with him a hundred and forty-four thousand who had his name and his Father’s name written on their foreheads.
*
Revelation 14:9-11 And another angel, a third, followed them, saying with a loud voice, “If any one worships the beast and its image, and receives a mark on his forehead or on his hand, [10] he also shall drink the wine of God’s wrath, poured unmixed into the cup of his anger, and he shall be tormented with fire and sulphur in the presence of the holy angels and in the presence of the Lamb. [11] And the smoke of their torment goes up for ever and ever; and they have no rest, day or night, these worshipers of the beast and its image, and whoever receives the mark of its name.”
*
Revelation 17:14 they will make war on the Lamb, and the Lamb will conquer them, for he is Lord of lords and King of kings, . . .
*
Revelation 19:9 . . . “Blessed are those who are invited to the marriage supper of the Lamb.” . . .
*
Revelation 22:1-3 Then he showed me the river of the water of life, bright as crystal, flowing from the throne of God and of the Lamb [2] through the middle of the street of the city; also, on either side of the river, the tree of life with its twelve kinds of fruit, yielding its fruit each month; and the leaves of the tree were for the healing of the nations. [3] There shall no more be anything accursed, but the throne of God and of the Lamb shall be in it, and his servants shall worship him;
In light of all of this biblical data, I submit that the Sacrifice of the Mass is not merely an arbitrary (and so we are accused, blasphemous and sacrilegious) ceremony; it’s quite biblical, since the Bible is still referring to a “Lamb slain” in heaven shortly after Jesus’ Ascension and St. John chooses to refer to Jesus 28 times as the “Lamb” in the book of Revelation, including visions of the end times and the end of the age and heaven itself.
*
If Jesus as a “slain lamb” (obviously referring to His sacrificial and redemptive crucifixion) is still a present factor in the last-written book of the Bible, describing events far into the future, then by the same token, it appears plausible and likely that Jesus is indeed present as a slain Lamb at every Mass. We merely imitate the worship that is clearly described in  Revelation 5:6-12 and 22:3 (as Scott Hahn so accurately noted).
*
Because this is so clear in Scripture, the Church fathers followed suit. Renowned Protestant historian Philip Schaff, who edited 38 volumes of the fathers’ writings, freely admits this:
In general, this period, . . . was already very strongly inclined toward the doctrine of transubstantiation, and toward the Greek and Roman sacrifice of the mass, which are inseparable in so far as a real sacrifice requires the real presence of the victim…… (Philip Schaff, History of the Christian Church, vol. 3, A. D. 311-600, revised 5th edition, Grand Rapids, Michigan: Eerdmans, reprinted 1974, originally 1910, p. 500)

*
***
*

Practical Matters:  I run the most comprehensive “one-stop” Catholic apologetics site: rated #1 for Christian sites by leading AI tool, ChatGPT — endorsed by popular Protestant blogger Adrian Warnock. Perhaps some of my 5,000+ free online articles or fifty-six books have helped you (by God’s grace) to decide to become Catholic or to return to the Church, or better understand some doctrines and why we believe them. If you believe my full-time apostolate is worth supporting, please seriously consider a much-needed monthly or one-time financial contribution. “The laborer is worthy of his wages” (1 Tim 5:18, NKJV).
*
PayPal donations are the easiest: just send to my email address: [email protected]. Here’s also a second page to get to PayPal. You’ll see the term “Catholic Used Book Service”, which is my old side-business. To learn about the different methods of contributing (including Zelle and 100% tax-deductible donations if desired), see my page: About Catholic Apologist Dave Armstrong / Donation Information.
*
You can support my work a great deal in non-financial ways, if you prefer; by subscribing to, commenting on, liking, and sharing videos from my YouTube channel, Catholic Bible Highlights, where I partner with Kenny Burchard (see my own videos), and/or by signing up to receive notice for new articles on this blog. Just type your email address on the sidebar to the right (scroll down quite a bit), where you see, “Sign Me Up!” Thanks a million!
*
***
*

Photo credit: Adoration of the Mystic Lamb, detail of the Ghent Altarpiece, c. 1432, by Jan van Eyck (c. 1390-1441) [public domain / Wikimedia Commons]

Summary: I highlight many remarkable corroborating passages in the books of Hebrews and Revelation, related to the miraculous timeless & sacrificial aspect of the Catholic Mass.

"I didn't realize there were two schools of thought about Dort. Interesting."

Reply to Lucas Banzoli’s 30 “Common” ..."
"I will admit that it's a conundrum. That's why I am a bit reluctant to ..."

Reply to Lucas Banzoli’s 30 “Common” ..."
"Beats me. It's been a huge and insuperable problem from the beginning, including Anglicanism. :-) ..."

Reply to Lucas Banzoli’s 30 “Common” ..."

Browse Our Archives