The Beatles’ album Revolver (which not a few fans consider their best) was released in 1966, and a new modern remix, done by George Martin’s son Giles Martin, was released on 28 October 2022. Here is my track-by-track analysis: focusing on audio sound quality and placement of singers and instruments in the new remix, and on how it compares to the previous “best” versions:
*
1. Taxman: the 2009 stereo remaster was absurd: most guitar, most drums, and bass on one side, and vocals, some percussion, guitar solo (which many don’t realize was performed by Paul), and some rhythm guitar on the other. The drums were particularly buried and unforgivably muffled. For these reasons, I think the best existing version before the ’22 remix was the 2009 mono mix: which puts it all in the “middle”, but has its own deficiencies and is not by any means great audio quality. The ’22 remix was released prior to the rest of the album on YouTube on 9-7-22. It’s vastly better, with drums, bass, and vocals in the middle, and rhythm guitar on the right (all sounding great).
*
My only criticism is that the left channel seems to oddly be almost unused, except for cowbells (!). Why couldn’t (for example) the guitar solo be placed in the left channel: just as in the 2009 stereo remaster it was separated? It makes perfect sense to me. But at least its placed in the center and can be distinguished from the rhythm guitar, so this now becomes the best mix. That’s the very sort of “jammed together” aspect that made the original stereo updated in the 2009 version less than ideal. I don’t understand the reasoning there. If it could be separated in the original mix, it certainly could have been again in this remix, to make it even more appealing and listenable.
2. Eleanor Rigby: this track had already been well-served by two “modern”-sounding and ear-pleasing stereo remixes: in 1999 on the Yellow Submarine “songtrack” and in 2015 for the remixed “1“: with the latter getting the nod because of the strings being out-of-sync in the 1999 remix (though it’s so slight that one hardly notices it). The new mix didn’t improve it all that much, since it was so good already, but it does seem to have a bit more vitality and energy and spaciousness, and the strings seem slightly more “biting” and Psycho-like menacing (which was intentional, I only recently learned) and clear.
3. I’m Only Sleeping: this wonderful, “could only have been from 1966” song from John wasn’t too bad in 2009 stereo, but it had an obnoxious right channel-only lead vocal. Therefore, I have preferred the mono mix from 2014, which is more satisfying and gives the drums the punch they deserve. Martin gives it much more “spaciousness” and warmth and “presence” with his studio magic, and the drums are just as punchy: whereas the mono sounds rather annoyingly tinny and “transistor radio-like” in comparison. So this is a most welcome and great improvement.
*
5. Here, There, and Everywhere: Paul’s Beach Boys’ Pet Sounds-inspired song had been best in the 2009 stereo, which had nicely separated harmonies. But the new mix has the drums and guitar (as I fully expected) more discernible, accentuated, and incorporated into a better, fuller soundscape.
*
*
*
*
14. Tomorrow Never Knows: this wonderful Lennon song that virtually began the psychedelic craze, was one of the better-sounding stereo cuts in its 2009 remastering, but the sound effects in particular needed to be made more clear and distinct. Martin has made it more “fun” and interesting to listen to, with the current state-of-the-art studio “trickery” and pure sound capabilities. The sound effects are better, and some of the drums can be heard separately, with a better echo. This trend-setting and influential song now sounds full and glorious and more clear: like today’s superior sound.
*
16. Rain: I love this “trippy” and unique song in the Beatles’ catalogue (B-side to Paperback Writer). The formerly best 2009 stereo suffered from an obnoxious left-only lead vocal and not-very-clear harmony vocals on the right. Both are thankfully corrected, as fully expected, and the marvelous drum performance sounds better and no longer muffled. The wonderfully jangly, Byrds-like sound of the guitars and the bass are also improved and more distinct. Ringo’s masterpiece now has an audio quality to match the excellent-as-always musicianship.
*
Conclusion: the entire album has been significantly improved and is a joy to hear for any Beatles fan. The only dud is Yellow Submarine. But we have the existing 1999 remix to make up for that deficiency.
*
***
*
***
*
Summary: My review of the new remix (by Giles Martin) of the Beatles 1966 album Revolver: which is considered by many people to be their best album. Just one “dud”!