2021-04-03T10:45:41-04:00

[see book and purchase information] According to Wikipedia: Greg L. Bahnsen (September 17, 1948 – December 11, 1995) was an American Calvinist philosopher, apologist, and debater. He was a minister in the Orthodox Presbyterian Church and a full-time Scholar in Residence for the Southern California Center for Christian Studies (SCCCS). He is also considered a contributor to the field of Christian apologetics, as he popularized the presuppositional method of Cornelius Van Til. I am replying to an article, “Is Sola Scriptura a Protestant Concoction?: A Biblical Defense of Sola Scriptura“ by Dr. Bahnsen; transcribed... Read more

2021-03-28T15:11:23-04:00

It’s good once in a while to look back in history, in order to ascertain the pedigree and “background information” on various strains of thought and movements of our present time. It struck me in watching — for about the fifth time — a documentary about the legendary folk music group, The Weavers (called The Weavers: Wasn’t That a Time!), how different some things were among those even considered “far left” in the 50s and 60s. The Weavers (Pete Seeger, Lee... Read more

2021-03-28T12:20:10-04:00

Chapter Ten of My Bestselling (and Probably Most Well-Known) Book, A Biblical Defense of Catholicism A Biblical Defense of Catholicism (my first book) was completed in May 1996 and “officially” published in June 2003 by Sophia Institute Press. The following is from pages 211-233, 238, minus the final section, Petrine panoply: fifty New Testament proofs for the pre-eminence of St. Peter: which I have long since linked as its own self-contained article. It was published in The Catholic Answer (Jan/Feb. 1997 issue).... Read more

2021-03-27T14:35:40-04:00

Some Protestants want to claim that the Mass is idolatrous? I could just as easily say (only rhetorically, not actually) that their denial of worship of Jesus in the consecrated host is blasphemy, since they are going against the very essence of the ritual and miracle by denying that He is really there (therefore they refuse worship and maintain that the bread and wine are never transformed). * [excerpt from a Treatise on Transubstantiation that I wrote in 2005] *... Read more

2021-03-26T14:12:25-04:00

[book and purchase information] Everyone has axioms that they can’t absolutely prove, by definition. That goes for atheist, nominalist, realist, pedestrian, blue-eyed, left-handed moth catcher, everybody. My epistemological position is that nothing can be proven absolutely, in a purely philosophical, logical sense, but that one can have a certitude of faith. I think that would be a supposition common to both Newman and a presuppositionalist. Cardinal Newman’s theory is a helpful paradigm for understanding development, which is only one aspect of Church history. Personally, I... Read more

2021-03-26T12:58:17-04:00

Atheist author and polemicist John W. Loftus wrote an article entitled, “Dr. David Madison, Debunker Par Excellence!” (3-25-21). His words will be in blue. ***** I’m a big fan of former Methodist minister and biblical scholar Dr. David Madison, who no longer believes. He understands how best to debunk Christianity. Really? I never noticed that. I have refuted his attacks on the Bible and Christianity now 44 times (without a peep in reply) and, frankly, it was always very easy to refute his nonsense: so... Read more

2021-03-25T15:38:11-04:00

[book and purchase information] Reply to a Protestant apologist’s comments (in blue) on a public discussion board: ***** Do you even comprehend that whether Newman’s theory is seen as “development” or “evolution” largely depends on one’s philosophical presuppositions . . . ? No, because that is a non sequitur. You seem to believe that one’s philosophy almost entirely colors their perceptions of theology, ecclesiology, and Church history. I don’t buy that (not nearly to the extent that you do). I continue... Read more

2021-03-25T14:29:01-04:00

[book and purchase information] All words are those of Pope Francis (both before and during his papacy), except for additional text in blue. ***** 1) In the coming weeks, the Argentine people will face a situation whose outcome can seriously harm the family…At stake is the identity and survival of the family: father, mother and children. At stake are the lives of many children who will be discriminated against in advance, and deprived of their human development given by a father... Read more

2021-03-24T14:28:47-04:00

Reformed Protestant apologist Matt Hedges wrote an article entitled, “Documentation for Pope Gelasius’ Denial of Transubstantiation” (3-23-21). In it, he claimed: Here is an interesting quote from Pope Gelasius concerning the nature of the elements of the bread and wine in the Eucharist: “The sacrament of the body and blood of Christ, which we receive, is a divine thing, because by it we are made partakers of the divine-nature. Yet the substance or nature of the bread and wine does not... Read more

2021-03-23T19:45:26-04:00

Reformed Protestant Anti-Catholic Apologists James White’s and James Swan’s Own Obsessions James Swan, a Reformed Protestant anti-Catholic polemicist, recently wrote a piece on his blog, Boors All, entitled, “James White Obsession Syndrome” (3-19-21). I got a particular kick out of this one, since I have a good deal of knowledge about the shenanigans of both James White (since 1995 when we debated by mail) and James Swan (whom I met online around 2002 or 2003). Swan writes: Now that the... Read more

Follow Us!


TAKE THE
Religious Wisdom Quiz

What meal did the Israelites eat before leaving Egypt?

Select your answer to see how you score.


Browse Our Archives