Anti-Catholic Notes My Article on Bible-Reading & Catholics

Anti-Catholic Notes My Article on Bible-Reading & Catholics January 25, 2020

[see book and purchase information]

See: “Why Are Catholics So Deficient in Bible-Reading?” (National Catholic Register, 11-22-17).


Catholics have written to this blog in the past objecting to my repeated assertion that relatively few of them read the Bible. Well, they read the Bible, they protest, so therefore my claim is incorrect. Argh. But what do they say when Dave Armstrong, one of Catholicism’s most sectarian apologists bemoans the exact same condition, which is regularly confirmed by independent surveys? I would love it if every Catholic bought a Bible and read it. Many would have a crisis of faith regarding their church as they confronted the stark differences between Catholic teaching and God’s Word.

I agree with it till the last sentence. If Catholics read the Bible more, they’d be strengthened in their Catholic faith, as I have always been, in my emphasis on “biblical Catholicism.” But it should be studied in conjunction with Catholic study as well (the Catechism and other good Catholic magisterial sources).

The Bible wasn’t meant to be read in isolation or interpreted without any input from Holy Mother Church and Sacred Tradition. That’s how many cults begin. It’s not just Protestantism that isolated Bible-reading may possibly lead to, but also heretical non-trinitarian cults like Jehovah’s Witnesses and Mormonism.

It’s precisely because such cults cling to “Bible Alone” and ignore the history of Christian doctrine (and or apostolic tradition), that they go astray. If they understood that trinitarianism had always been held from the beginning of the Christian Church, they could never deny it. But they are ignorant of Church history, and so pretend that trinitarianism was a late-arriving doctrine (like, say, sola fide and sola Scriptura, which began 15 centuries after Christ).

I’m not calling for Bible memorization, but simple reading, at least as committed as the effort that folks put into reading novels and any number of other things.

The problem with Protestant use of the Bible, too often (especially fundamentalists and anti-Catholics and hard-core Calvinists), is that they tend to simply cite “pet” verses, while ignoring the many passages that go against their view. So what at first seems impressive is actually highly selective, almost robotic citation. If you talk about faith, out comes John 3:16, etc., like a mantra. But that’s only one of a hundred or more relevant passages. It seems to fit in well with faith alone, so they use it.


Related Reading:

“Why Don’t Catholics Read the Bible?” [6-26-02]

Catholic “Three-Legged Stool”: Scripture, Tradition, & Church: Dialogue with an Anglican on the Catholic Rule of Faith (vs. Jon Jacobson) [10-31-02]

The Freedom of the Catholic Biblical Exegete / Interpreter + Bible Passages that the Church has Definitively Interpreted [9-14-03]

“Biblical Evidence” from the Catholic Point of View [2-1-08]

Bibles & Catholics, Sunday School?, Memorization, Etc. [9-25-08]

How Do Catholics Approach & Interpret Holy Scripture? [6-17-09]

Were Vernacular Bibles Unknown Before Luther? (+ later Facebook discussion) [6-15-11]

Bible & Catholicism: 10 Interview Questions [9-4-15]

Catholic Church: Historic “Enemy” of the Bible? [9-11-15]

Catholic Church: Superior to the Bible?: Does the Catholic Church Claim to be ‘Above’ the Bible and Its “Creator”? [9-14-15]

“Explicit” Bible Proofs & Protestant Double Standards [2-12-16]

Dialogue with a Protestant on Catholics & the Bible [6-5-16]

Criticism of My This Rock Article About Bible-Reading [5-20-17]

Armstrong vs. Collins & Walls #5: The Church “Gave” the Bible? [10-19-17]

Catholic Church vs. the Bible? Exchange w Protestant [10-31-17]

Reply to Comments Re: My Article on Catholics & the Bible [11-28-17]

Did Jesus Commission the New Testament (or the Disciples?) [5-31-18]

Martin Luther on the Exact Nature of Being “Biblical” [11-10-14; revised and expanded on 1-5-20]


Unfortunately, Money Trees Do Not ExistIf you have been aided in any way by my work, or think it is valuable and worthwhile, please strongly consider financially supporting it (even $10 / month — a mere 33 cents a day — would be very helpful). I have been a full-time Catholic apologist since Dec. 2001, and have been writing Christian apologetics since 1981 (see my Resume). My work has been proven (by God’s grace alone) to be fruitful, in terms of changing lives (see the tangible evidences from unsolicited “testimonies”). I have to pay my bills like all of you: and have a (homeschooling) wife and three children still at home to provide for, and a mortgage to pay.
My book royalties from three bestsellers in the field (published in 2003-2007) have been decreasing, as has my overall income, making it increasingly difficult to make ends meet.  I provide over 2600 free articles here, for the purpose of your edification and education, and have written 50 books. It’ll literally be a struggle to survive financially until Dec. 2020, when both my wife and I will be receiving Social Security. If you cannot contribute, I ask for your prayers (and “likes” and links and shares). Thanks!
See my information on how to donate (including 100% tax-deductible donations). It’s very simple to contribute to my apostolate via PayPal, if a tax deduction is not needed (my “business name” there is called “Catholic Used Book Service,” from my old bookselling days 17 or so years ago, but send to my email: Another easy way to send and receive money (with a bank account or a mobile phone) is through Zelle. Again, just send to my e-mail address. May God abundantly bless you.


(originally 11-26-17 on Facebook)


"Hello Dave:Sorry, a senior moment for not replying sooner. To err is human, to forgive ..."

Resurrection #20: Motivation of Judas’ Betrayal
"Hello Dave:Thank you for writing. Below is a reply to your ADDENDUM.You wrote:ADDENDUM: Clarifying Note ..."

Resurrection #29: Supposed Absence of the ..."
"Hello Paul:AWESOME!!! Well, believe it or not, on page 567 this writer identified seven opinions. ..."

Resurrection #26: “Twelve” or Eleven Disciples?
"Hello Dave:Thank you for writing. You are writing about CONTRADICTION #115 Omissions Detailing the Ascension ..."

Resurrection #29: Supposed Absence of the ..."

Browse Our Archives

error: Content is protected !!