Closed States Do NOT Lower COVID-19 Cases & Deaths

Closed States Do NOT Lower COVID-19 Cases & Deaths April 9, 2021

. . . And Open States Are Doing Just Fine: the Opposite of the Confident Dire Predictions

Henry Karlson, who writes on the Patheos Catholic channel (same host as my blog) recently opined:

It seems we have not yet learned what we can from our experience with the pandemic. We should have learned how we are in this together. We should have seen real world examples of how what one person can adversely affect the rest of us. Selfishness leads to destruction. Carelessness leads to destruction. Indifference leads to destruction. We must care. We must care for each other and the world we live in. If we don’t, things will only get worse. . . .

People who don’t want to deal with the problems facing us as a society often find all kinds of excuses to ignore or reject the truth, including, and especially through the creation of conspiracy theories. They want us to believe everything is normal and everything is fine. But things are not fine, and they have not been fine for a long time. COVID19 should serve as a wakeup call, but it seems, rather, people still want to deny their responsibility to the world. They want to abdicate their role as stewards over the earth and deny that they have any moral responsibility over the welfare of their neighbor.

The gist of this (whether stated or not) is that us wicked conservatives are a bunch of heartless, anti-science (and extremely impatient) conspiratorialists, and that we literally (and willfully / deliberately!) cause deaths by our reckless irresponsibility and constant irrational haranguing for opening up states and businesses and sports event, etc.

Very well, then; why don’t we descend into some actual statistics and rates of infection and death: shall we?

A week ago, I cited an article, “Here’s Where COVID-19 Cases Are Rising and Falling” ( I believe its original date was 31 March 2021. I was writing on 2 April 2021 on my Facebook page. The article has since been updated, so the statistics I cited (in the first section below) were from the original version. The update will allow us to see if the point I was making a week ago has been sustained into this week.

Here is my original Facebook post: which of course virtually none of my 5,000 friends and 2,750 followers on Facebook saw, since Facebook censors every conservative post. On Patheos (to its eternal credit) I have full freedom of speech:

[my bracketed comments added. For statistics, I quote the article that is linked in the combox]
The CDC reports that Michigan [very strict policy] recorded the most new cases in the past 7 days with 36,100. [10 million population; one new case out of 277 people]
Florida [completely open] was second with 35,357 new cases, over 4,000 more than the previous week. [21.5 million; one new case out of 608 people]
New Jersey [very strict policy] was third with 31,236 new cases, nearly 3,000 more than a week ago. [8.9 million; one in 285 people]
New York [very strict policy] was fourth with 27,068 new cases, over 2,000 more than the previous week. [19.5 million; one in 720]
Texas [completely open] was fifth with 22,672 cases. [29 million; one in 1279 people]
Controlled for population, then, here are the percentage rates (worst to best) for the five states with the most new cases:
1) Michigan [closed]: 1 in 277.
2) New Jersey [closed]: 1 in 285.
3) Florida [open]: 1 in 608.
4) New York [closed]: 1 in 720.
5) Texas [open]: 1 in 1279.
Thus, one is, statistically, 4.6 times more likely to get the virus in closed Michigan than in open Texas, and 2.2 times more likely compared to open Florida.
Michigan had the highest rate of cases with 361 cases per 100,000 residents over the past 7 days.
New Jersey was second with 351 cases per 100,000 residents, followed by Connecticut at 246 per 100,000 residents and New York with 244 per 100,000 residents.
As we can see, the closed states (generally Democrat Governors) are (overall or broadly) showing more cases than the open ones. So does this indicate that the shutdown policies are working very well? Nope. More:
California recorded the most COVID-19 deaths over the past 7 days with 1,233, about 740 more than the previous week.
Texas was second with 691 reported deaths, followed by Florida with 468, and Georgia with 406.
Closed California beats open Texas with almost twice as many deaths. California has 39.5 million people; Texas has 29 million. So that is one death per 32,036 people in closed California, and one death per 41,968 people in open Texas.


Now I shall look at the revised statistics from the same article.

The number of COVID-19 deaths averaged 830 per day this past week, a 17 percent drop.

How can this be?!: what with all these wicked, careless red states opening up? How can it possibly decrease?

Hospitalizations now stand at around 37,000, up slightly from a week ago.

Why wouldn’t it be a massive increase, with all the opening-up states? Dallas even had a baseball game with a full stadium. How odd. You mean, the [ultra-liberal] media might actually be lying and distorting again? They would never do that, would they?

This past week, 27 states reported increases in COVID-19 cases compared with 33 states the prior week.

More (slight) improvement, though we’re obviously not totally out of the woods yet; we have a long way to go.

Figures from Johns Hopkins University in Maryland indicate 44 percent of the new cases last week came from just 5 states.

The CDC reported that Michigan had the most new cases in the past 7 days with 46,879. That’s 10,000 more than the previous week.

Florida was second with 37,293 new cases, and Pennsylvania third with 29,355 new cases. Both states were about the same as last week.

New Jersey was fourth with 28,596 new cases, about 2,000 fewer than the previous week.

New York was fifth with 26,976 cases.

Texas and California, which used to be among the top states, reported about 18,000 new cases each this past week.

My main topic is the data of more closed states compared to open states. According to current unquestionable Liberal Dogma (with anyone daring to question it being an anti-scientific troglodyte and flat-earth conspiracist), it’s supposed to be the case that closing up states and business will lower the incidence of the virus. The big problem with this is that the actual statistics are showing no such correlation: and in many cases, the exact opposite of this confident prediction.

What we do know for sure is that many small businesses that were forced to close or operate far less than capacity for months or now even over a year, are gone forever; with many lives financially ruined.

We see in the previous citation above that my own Michigan, with one of the most notoriously strict policies in the nation, led the country in most cases for the second straight week, with an increase of 10,000. How did “strict” laws and decrees from on high lower the rate of infection here? Not very well, did it? Florida (totally open) was second; but more on that below, as we control for population. Three more Democrat-run and blue states follow, in the 3rd, 4th, and 5th spots. So four out of five states with the most cases overall have closed policies and are blue states.

Now let’s control for population, as I did last week. This is an important (and often overlooked) factor. Here are the worst states this week, according to this metric:

1) Michigan [closed, blue]: one per 213 people (down from 1 in 277 last week)

2) New Jersey [closed, blue]: one per 311 people (up from 1 in 285 last week)

3) Pennsylvania [closed, blue]: one case per 436 people

4) Florida [open, red]: one case per 577 people (down from 1 in 608 last week)

5) New York [closed, blue]: one per 723 people (about the same: 1 in 720 last week)

6) Texas [open, red]: one per 1611 (up from 1 in 1279 last week)

7) California [closed, blue]: one per 2194 people

The article reflected my stats, controlling per 100,000 people:

The CDC also reported that Michigan had the highest rate of cases with 469 cases per 100,000 residents over the past 7 days. That’s almost 100 higher than the previous week.

New Jersey was second with 321 cases per 100,000 residents, followed by New York at 244 per 100,000 residents and Pennsylvania with 229 per 100,000 residents.

Texas has declined to 66 cases per 100,000, while California has fallen to 44 cases per 100,000 residents.

So we see again that four out of the first five states with the most cases per population have closed policies and are blue states. Florida’s in there, too, but seeing that it has a totally open policy (and disproportionate elderly), it’s doing remarkably well and is surpassed by the closed / blue states. The four worst states per 100,000 are also closed / blue states. This is not supposed to be!

Texas is also famously open; so how is it doing so far? One in 1611 people have obtained COVID-19 in the last week. Thus, one is 7.6 times more likely to catch the virus in Michigan, compared to Texas, 5.2 times more likely in New Jersey, 3.7 times more likely in Pennsylvania, and 2.2 times more likely in New York state. Sounds like Texas is doing pretty good, huh? What do you think, dear reader?

One might say that California is the glorious exception: a rare success in a blue state. But it had the most COVID deaths in the last week, with 865. The good news, however, is that it was a decline of 38%. New York was second with 595. Texas and Florida followed. Let’s now calculate the deaths by population:

New York [closed / blue]: one death per 32,773 people

Florida [open / red]: one death per 42,240 people

California [closed / blue]: one death per 45,664 people

Texas [open / red]: one death per 50,260 people

Michigan [Detroit News data] [closed / blue]: one death per 52,083

Closed New York is the worst, open Florida comes in second, then closed and open states. Thus, it seems about equal or slightly leaning towards blue states, for the most deaths. But it’s a very low rate anywhere, it has dropped 17% nationwide, and even in the state with the most new cases (Michigan), the rate is only one death per 52,083 people.

Conclusion: closing up states has little effect. In terms of overall cases and cases per 100,000 or the entire population, red / open states are doing significantly better than blue / closed states. They are supposed to be doing far worse, according to our Liberal Overlords: the Masters of All Science and Reason. Rates for deaths show little correlation of being lower (neither significantly nor at all) in blue states. Nothing strongly confirms the liberal / widely accepted predictions.

Now, it is true that 1) delayed surges or “spikes” may take place, due to these openings, and that 2) new strains (particularly the pesky English variant) may change the equation. We’ll see. I take the scientific approach, not the hysterical / propagandistic one. If the stats show that opening up was a huge mistake, I will be the first to admit it. I’m not here to be right, but rather, to accurately report the facts as we know them (i.e., the way journalism used to function). But so far so good.

As for delayed surges, it’s relevant to examine how long Texas and Florida in particular have been opened up. Around 25 September 2020, “Gov. Ron DeSantis lifted all restrictions on restaurants and other businesses in Florida . . ., and banned local fines against people who refuse to wear masks as he seeks to reopen the state’s economy . . .” By my math, that’s over six months of being more or less totally open, and we haven’t seen the Apocalypse or otherwise unsavory catastrophe: even (notably) in a state well-known for its large senior citizen population.

Texas is doing far better statistically than Florida. When did it open up? It was on 2 March 2021. So that’s five weeks (time to observe delayed spikes), and we see no momentous or foreboding disaster taking place. It has one COVID case in 1611 people and one death per 50,260 people: a better rate than California and New York.

If these positive trends continue, isn’t it time, in the not-too-distant future, to get back to normal? Many states (almost all red, Republican-run) have done so. Civilization hasn’t collapsed. The Black Death hasn’t returned. The proof’s in the pudding.


Related Reading

I have criticized extremism and alarmism from both the far right and the far left from the beginning, and have tried to objectively examine the facts of the matter, and what science tells us (I’ve also strictly observed — away from my family — all state regulations, by the way, in case anyone is wondering). See other papers of mine:

US Coronavirus Deaths: Elderly with Preconditions [3-13-20]

Taylor Marshall: Pachamama “Idolatry” Judged by Coronavirus (Yet “Antichrist” Pope Francis Walks the Streets of Pandemic-Ravaged Rome Free of the Virus . . .) [3-17-20]

Alexander Tschugguel, Taylor Marshall, & God’s Wrath [3-19-20]

“Black Death” Mentality On Display at Patheos Catholic [3-26-20]

Dialogue: [Irrational?] Leftish Reactions to Coronavirus [3-27-20]

Dialogue on Leftish Reactions to Coronavirus, Part II [3-27-20]

Why Has Italy Suffered the Most from Coronavirus? (+ Reflections on the Propriety of Using the Term, “Chinese Flu” / Condemnation of Anti-Chinese Prejudice) [3-28-20]

Coronavirus: Chris Ferrara vs. Science & Historical Precedent (Social Distancing Was Used in the 1918 Flu Pandemic and Has Been Shown Again and Again to be Highly Effective) [4-7-20]

Priest Blasphemes God (Coronavirus = Judgment?) [4-10-20]

Dialogue: Is Coronavirus the Way that God Judges? [4-13-20]

Face Masks: Is Scientific Evidence Unanimous? [7-10-20]

Mandatory COVID Vaccines & Facebook Fascist Censorship [2-9-21]


Photo credit: Ryanx7 (3-19-14): Normal Ave, Chico, California [WikimediaCreative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license]


Summary: I looked at COVID-19 statistics from the Healthline website & compared rates in open & closed states for this week & last week. Conclusion: closing has almost no correlation to reduction.

Browse Our Archives

Close Ad