December 8, 2014

Towards the end of the semester in my Paul class, we’ve focused on the disputed and inauthentic epistles attributed to Paul. One detail that never struck me quite as forcefully before about 2 Thessalonians is its ending: “ I, Paul, write this greeting with my own hand. This is the mark in every letter of mine; it is the way I write.”

SinaiticusManuscriptImageI had noticed before that this – like the warning about “a letter as though from us” – could be an attempt by the forger to fly under the radar, as it were, by providing reassurances and warning about forgeries. Since letters would by that time have been read in copies, there would be no actual change of handwriting. It’s a clever trick.

I had also noticed the fact that, in letters that are considered authentic, we actually don’t find Paul writing something in his own hand in every instance.

But what struck me for the first time was the emphasis on “every letter of mine.” If 2 Thessalonian is authentic, it would need to be among the earliest of Paul’s letters. 1 Thessalonians is thought by most to be the earliest, and the strong similarity between the two letters would necessitate that they be close in time to one another.

And so it makes no sense for Paul, early in his letter-writing activity, to talk about “every letter of mine.” But to a later forger, reference to Paul’s many letters would have come naturally.

What do you think about the authorship of 2 Thessalonians? What evidence persuades you to draw the conclusion that you do?

September 18, 2014

When we moved from introductory matters to diving into one of the epistles in my Paul class, we started with 1 Thessalonians, usually thought to be the earliest of Paul’s letters.

This gave me the opportunity to revisit the question of whether 1 Thessalonians 2:14-16 is a post-Pauline interpolation.

It is worth noting that there is no manuscript evidence that this passage is an addition. It is also worth noting that its interruption of the train of thought is not in and of itself grounds for deeming it an interpolation: Paul’s penchant for interrupting himself and returning to his earlier train of thought is well known, and it is scarcely a trait unique to Paul for that matter. It is also worth noting that some have had clear motives for wanting the text to be post-Pauline – either in order to clear Paul of charges of anti-Semitism, or in order to fit their view that Paul never mentions Jesus’ historicity. The last standpoint clearly involves a circular approach, since Paul mentions a number of things that indicate Jesus’ historicity, and excising such things as supposed exceptions is nothing more than the disposing of  inconvenient counter-evidence.

In this case, however, there are other considerations, related to content and also linguistics, which also suggest that the passage is an interpolation. And were I to defend its authenticity, it could be pointed out that, on some level, I might wish the passage to be authentic, just because of what it would mean in discussions of mythicism. And so I cannot pretend to be unbiased any more than other interpreters can.

The most interesting detail I came across in reading up on the topic was the fact that the final phrase, which is the one that seems to have in view the events of 70 CE, has a close echo in T. Levi 6:11 (in Greek, and not just in English – see F. F. Bruce’s Word Biblical Commentary, p.48): “But the wrath of the Lord came upon them to the uttermost.” Since that is a Jewish text that has undergone Christian redaction, it is impossible to tell which came first. But it is a neglected consideration when 1 Thessalonians 2:16 is discussed. 

There certainly are events in the time period that might seem to be expressions of divine wrath. But even if the events of 70 CE need not be seen in the text, we must also ask whether Paul could complain about the persecution of churches in Judaea, without any mention of the fact that he had previously been involved in the persecution.

And so perhaps this is one of those instances in which the best course is an acknowledgement of uncertainty, even if one thinks that one conclusion or the other is warranted.

Of related interest, also in this epistle, and relevant to discussions of mythicism, we find Paul says in 2:13, “you received the word of God, which you heard from us.” And so, while Paul emphatically insists in Galatians that his core Gospel was not something he derived from other human beings, clearly we cannot read that (presumably dishonest) attempt to claim total independence from other human authorities into other places where Paul speaks of receiving something, even if that something is said to be the “word of God” or “from the Lord.” Clearly Paul uses such language even when a human mediator is involved.

Do you think that the 1 Thessalonians 2:14-16 is an original part of the letter, or an interpolation?

November 29, 2010

Students in my class on the Bible each make a presentation on the topic for one class. Today we were up to the subject of pseudepigraphy and the epistles attributed to Paul, and the student who presented shared this video by Eman Laerton:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1cTmCxyPh_c?fs=1

It took a while until I realized that this is the same person who produced the “Mr. Gospel Potato Head” video some of us have shared before.

September 27, 2023

I had a delightful conversation with Elliot Saxton on his Brave New History YouTube channel. At the end we emphasized that we were having the conversation on Earth (poking fun at mythicists who insist that Paul in his letters assumed certain things happened in heaven, since he didn’t explicitly say otherwise). That led to the suggestion that we should have the next conversation in space, which in turn led to some geekiness as I pulled a Star Trek model off my shelf. Here is the video:

What I mentioned above led to some analogies between modern scenarios involving television or film and some of the New Testament literature. For instance, what if Acts ends on a cliffhanger because its author hoped that his series (a remake or reboot of Mark’s Gospel) would be renewed for a third season, but Theophilus declined to fund it and so it was axed? What if Luke is a prequel to Acts rather than Acts being a sequel to Luke, and we are misled by the prologue that was added later (akin to the way the original Star Wars movie now begins with Episode IV A New Hope)?

These are some of the things we didn’t talk about in the recorded conversation. One thing we did talk about and I think perhaps I should have answered differently. What’s the best argument for mythicism? I think it is Richard Carrier’s suggestion, which many of his followers embrace, that Paul’s reference to Jesus as “of the seed of David” had in mind not human genealogical descent from David, but a celestial sperm bank. Now, to be clear, I don’t think that suggestion is persuasive. On the contrary, it is bizarre. But the fact that so many mythicists are willing to read this bizarre idea into Paul’s letter to the church in Rome lends weight to their claim that it is plausible that the crucified Davidic messiah Jesus was invented because “people believe weird stuff.” By believing weird stuff themselves, they make that point stronger. Nevertheless, the motivated reasoning of mythicists, the deep-seated desire to have all early Christian claims be completely false and nonsensical in a simple way, provides an explanation as to why they hold this view. It would still require a strong case for why ancient people would have invented precisely this Jesus for mythicism to even become plausible, never mind probable.

I am also glad that I was able to illustrate in our conversation that there is so much to the field of New Testament/early Christianity that no one of us has it all memorized by heart and ready to produce off the cuff on demand. I mostly work on historical Jesus, Gospels, and of course the Mandaeans and John the Baptist. I covered Paul’s letters in my studies and have occasionally turned attention to passages in them. I also try to stay at least somewhat abreast of new developments. But it is a different area of expertise than my own. I mention this to say that one should never be impressed by debaters who treat it as though it were some sort of “gotcha” if a scholar misspeaks about a point from memory or doesn’t know a verse number by heart. It really, really, is nothing of the sort, and can only seem that way to those who’ve never studied a subject sufficiently to grasp just how much there is to it. That’s an issue among mythicists and conservative religious people alike. Both groups are prone to make sweeping statements and compete in attempts at point-scoring, while actual understanding of history or literature requires painstaking attention to detail, a process that instills in most scholars (and all the good ones) a hefty dose of humility. On the passage in 1 Thessalonians that we discussed there is now a recent post by Dave Allens.

In the talk we also had my new book The A to Z of the New Testament in view. I’d like to make more videos about the book and do other things to answer questions that potential readers may have. I wrote it hoping it would be useful not only to individuals on their own but educators and church groups. If you want to know more about it, just ask!

August 3, 2022

I thought I should share this information about an upcoming online conference since there does not seem to be much info about it online and given the topic and presenters I know that my biblical studies colleagues who focus on Paul more than I do will want to attend.

Bratislava Conference 2022: September, 19–22
Receptions of Paul during the First Two Centuries: Exploration of the Jewish Matrix of Early Christianity

Location: Comenius University Bratislava, Evangelical (Lutheran) Theological Faculty (The conference will occur online as a virtual gathering via MS Teams)

Schedule
(Central European time) (Draft)

Monday, September 19, 2022:

14:00 – 14:15 – Opening
František Ábel, Maroš Nicák

14:15 – 19:45 – Session One: Knowing What’s What in the Early Reception of Paul the Apostle

14:15 – 15:15 James H. Charlesworth, Princeton Theological Seminary, USA Correcting Some Misperceptions About Paul

15:15 – 16:15 Michael Bachmann, University of Siegen, Germany
Observations on the Reception of the Pauline Expression “works of the law”

16:15 – 17:15 J. Brian, Tucker, Moody Theological Seminary, Plymouth, USA
The Perception of Paul’s Social Influence in the Corinthian Correspondence

17:15 – 17:45 Break

17:45 – 18:45 Paul B. Duff, George Washington University, USA
John’s Reading or “Jezebel’s”: The Contested Reception of 1 Corinthians in the Late First Century

18:45 – 19:45 Neil Elliott, Independent Scholar, USA
The Quintessence of Pauline Deracination

 

Tuesday, September 20, 2022:

13:30 – 14:00 – Informal gathering of participants

14:00 – 19:30 – Session Two: The Early Reception of Paul the Apostle in the Deutero-Pauline Letters

14:00 – 15:00 Stefan Krauter, University of Zürich, Switzerland
The Pastoral Epistles and the Jewish Paul

15:00 – 16:00 Kathy Ehrensperger, University of Potsdam, Germany
Gender Roles in the House and in the Ekklesia: Pauline Trajectories in the Pastorals

16:00 – 17:00 Karl Olav Sandnes, MF Norwegian School of Theology, Religion and Society, Norway
The Colossian “Philosophy” and Torah: Paul in a New Context

17:00 – 17:30 Break

17:30 – 18:30 Kenneth Atkinson, University of Northern Iowa, USA
The “Man of Lawlessness” as an Eschatological Enemy in Second Thessalonians and its Second Temple Period Jewish Background

18:30 – 19:30 Joshua Garroway, Hebrew Union College – Jewish Institute of Religion, USA
The Triumph of Paul in Portraits of Peter

Wednesday, September 21, 2022:

13:30 – 14:00 – Informal gathering of participants

14:00 – 19:30 – Session Three: The Early Reception of Paul the Apostle in the Acts of the Apostles

14:00 – 15:00 Jiří Lukeš, Charles University Prague, Czech Republic
From Pharisee to Ascetic. The Shift of the Image of the Apostle Paul in the Literature of the Genre of Acts

15:00 – 16:00 Ruben A. Bühner, University of Zürich, Switzerland
Paul’s Torah Praxis According to Acts in Light of Recent Reconfigurations of Paul’s Jewishness

16:00 – 16:30 Break

16:30 – 17:30 Istvan Ledan, Debrecen Reformed Theological University, Hungary
The Image of Paul in Act’s Speeches

17:30 – 18:30 Dančiaková, Valéria Terézia, Comenius University Bratislava, Slovakia
Charges against Paul in Acts 16:21: The Term τό ἔθος in the Context of Roman Law

18:30 – 19:30 Gabriele Boccaccini, University of Michigan, USA
The Reception of Paul in the Acts of the Apostles

 

Thursday, September 22, 2022:

13:30 – 14:00 – Informal gathering of participants
14:00 – 17:30 – Session Four: The Other Receptions of Paul the Apostle

14:00 – 15:00 Noffke, Eric, Facoltà Valdese di Teologia, Roma, Italy
How Pauline is the Gospel of John?

15:00 – 16:00 Pavel Paluchník, Evangelical Theological Seminary of Prague, Czech Republic
The Epistle to the Hebrews: A Consoling Appeal to Ostracized Jewish Christians (and non-Christian
Jews) in the Roman Empire?

16:00 – 17:00
František Ábel, Comenius University Bratislava, Slovakia
Παύλου συμμύσται ἐστε. Ignatius’ Reception of Paul and Jewishness in the Antiochean Context: Another Piece of Mosaic

17:00 – 17:30 Final evaluation of the conference

 

More information here

 

April 27, 2022

Richard Beck has begun a new series on Paul’s theology, after reading (among other things) Gabriele Boccaccini’s book Paul’s Three Paths to Salvation (currently available for only $5 for Kindle!). Here is a taste from Beck’s first post:

Paul thought judgment was imminent. So this time of “holding fast” wasn’t going to be very long. It was a doable proposition. Hang in there, be faithful, the time is short. But as generations have passed, the lag time between justification and judgment has grown. Most of us are “justified by faith” early in life, and we expect to die before the Second Coming. That’s a very long time to “hold fast.” Our moral witness ebbs and flows across the lifespan. And as it does, it brings to our attention those New Testament warnings about falling away. It also raises questions about how effortful this moral journey is. You have to work very hard at it, day in and day out, decade after decade. Which raises the question: Isn’t all this work morphing into a works-based righteousness? Especially when we compare ourselves to believers who are putting in precisely zero work and effort? How, exactly, is justification and sanctification supposed to work? Can those “justified by faith” behave any way they please, for their entire lives, with no consequences? If so, what’s the point of putting in any work at all in following Jesus if none of it matters? Is not faith dead without works? And yet, if we do work hard, and think that work matters before God and will be rewarded by God, are we are not expecting to be judged by our acts of righteousness instead of grace?

We enter here the tempest of questions that have swirled around these issues since Martin Luther. But again, these are our issues, not Paul’s. Paul never had to deal with the theological, moral, and pastoral implications of a delayed parousia.

Click through to Beck’s blog Experimental Theology to read the rest. In his second post in the series he turns to the relationship between Jesus and John the Baptist! I am not sure he comes up with an actual distinction between the two (which doesn’t surprise me). He writes, “Jesus retains John’s vision of a coming judgement…Jesus also teaches, as with John, that this judgment will be focused upon works…It’s difficult to avoid the conclusion that Jesus preached that we will be judged by our deeds on Judgment Day. Both Jesus and John agree on this point…Jesus and John were on the same Second Temple eschatological page.” Read the rest of that post on his blog.

Also related:

Marg Mowczko shares Judith Gundry’s arguments and conclusions about 1 Corinthians 11:2-16

New in Hervormde Teologiese Studies 77/2 (2021): Andries G. van Aarde, “What could Paul have meant by ‘against nature’ (παρὰ φύσιν) as written in Romans 1:26? Striving for the well-being and health of all people.B. J. Oropeza has a new article out in Religions (also open access, just like the previous one I mentioned) about reader competency and Paul’s use of scripture in Romans.

Dr. Yung Suk Kim explains why “Pistis Christou is a bone of contention”and also offers a new translation of 1 Corinthians 12:27.

Dr. Patrick McMurray on his new book Sacrifice, Brotherhood, and the Body: Abraham and the Nations in Romans

Rev. Dr. Jeffrey Frantz argues that Paul was “a First Century Feminist.” Do you agree? Why or why not?

Paul and Pneuma, Justin and Judaism: Introduction

Paul and the Gentile Problem

Rillera’s Myth Busting Busting: Romans 8:3 (2 of 7)

Rillera’s Myth Busting Busting: Galatians 3:13-14 (3 of 7)

Look Inside! Romans: A Theological and Pastoral Commentary

Romans: A Theological and Pastoral Commentary

The Word of the Cross: Reading Paul

Paul: A Multicultural Leader

COVID-19 and Romans 15, Part 1: Problematic Reunions

COVID-19 and Romans 15, Part 2: Pauline Solutions

The Letter to the Romans, by Frederick Dale Bruner

7 Questions with Frederick Dale Bruner

A New Commentary on Romans, by David Garland

Romans 13:1-7 – Translates, Paraphrase, and Notes

Rom 3:21-26 – Translates, Paraphrase, Notes

Look Inside! The Letter to the Romans

What would Righteousness Look Like for Paul’s Original Roman Audience?

N. T. Wright, Galatians (Commentaries for Christian Formation)

A Solution to a Major Anomaly in the Study of Paul: Guest Post by Richard Fellows

Galatians, Evangelical Biblical Theology Commentary

A Basic Lesson from Paul

Paul’s Greatest Idea: Cosmic Transformation

Vice Lists in Paul’s Letters: 5 Observations

Video from the Paul Within Judaism Symposium (HT The Amateur Exegete):

Tom Holland on Paul

Why Paul’s letters are inadequate for understanding salvation

Desire in Paul’s Undisputed Epistles

Pistis christou: whose faith?

Romans 3:22 as snapshot of the gospel

Updated slides on Galatians: Paul’s most urgent letter

In Christ We Trust: Roman Fides and Christian Faith

What was Paul’s Thorn in the Flesh?

‘Paul the Apostle’ by J. Albert Harrill: A Brief Review

Paul had not abandoned Judaism

New book: Paul and Philo on Abraham

Christoph Heilig’s book Paulus als Erzähler? Eine narratologische Perspektive auf die Paulusbriefe is available open access. (HT AWOL)

There are new open access articles that have been published on Paul, empire, and eschatology, the interpretation of the end in Thessalonians, and the power of forgiveness in Ephesians. Also open access is Paul Foster’s article in Expository Times 133/1 (2021)An Apostle Too Radical for the Radical Perspective on Paul.” A book from 1900 by W. G. Rutherford on Romans has been digitized and made available for free online. See also:

St Paul in Asia Minor and Syrian Antioch by E H Plumptre

“Paul within Judaism” Symposium

Richard Beck on J. Louis Martyn’s treatment of Paul’s apocalyptic epistemology

ECR Interview: Dr. Joshua Reno

Nijay and Mike Bird on Romans 12-15 on Two Testaments Podcast

Mike Bird and Nijay Gupta talk about Paul, Philemon, and Onesimus. Mike also blogged about Paul and masculinity (interacting with and highlighting a recent book on the subject), justification by faith, and Paul and supersessionism. See as well Mike’s post on “Romans 8 and the Assurance of God’s Love in Hard Times” and on “the epicenter of Paul’s gospel.” He also shared this video:

New on the Bible Odyssey website: “Romans and the Fate of Israel”

Bill Mounce on giving credit in Romans, the word γάρ in Romans 12:3, the letter referred to in 1 Corinthians 5:11, and doing everything in love

Philemon: One in Christ

Bob Cornwall on Abounding in Love and First Things

AJR highlighted a new book about temple language in 1 Corinthians and another about divine politics and polemics in Paul’s letters

Michael Kruger on the “righteousness of God” in the 1984 edition of the NIV

Charles Savelle shared about a new commentary on Romans, as well as multiple posts about Colossians.

Interview with Luke Timothy Johnson in The Christian Century

“Put on the Full Armor of God”: Applying Ephesians 6:10-18

Podcast on Voices and Views on Paul

What Was Paul’s Thorn In The Flesh?

Slides on Galatians: Paul’s most urgent letter

Apostle of Persuasion– Part One

Apostle of Persuasion— Part Two

Apostle of Persuasion– Part Three

Apostle of Persuasion– Part Four

Apostle of Persuasion— Part Five

That series continues on Ben’s blog. From Ian Paul:

How should we preach on St Paul’s exhortations?

Was Paul a Universalist?

Allan Bevere on Paul as ambassador

Not brand new but still worth sharing:

Why the apostle Paul was in prison so often

 

January 25, 2021

So what has been happening lately in the study of Paul? Biblical studies blogs, as usual, are a good place to get a sense of things, and that is an important service both to scholars and to the general public. The latter should be asking primarily about the consensus when there is one. The former will know when there is a consensus and if so what it is, and will want to see what is new, not with a view to uncritically embracing it, but to have a sense of what they should be thinking about and perhaps interacting with.

Let me start with this blog post on the Cambridge University Press blog which includes some free articles:

Does Wright Get Paul on Israel Right? Continued Debate « Humanities « Cambridge Core Blog

Next, here’s Publisher’s Weekly surveying some new books about Paul

Lisa Bowens on African-American Readings of Paul

Open access book: Eve-Marie Becker, Der Philipperbrief des Paulus : Vorarbeiten zu einem Kommentar

Finding Paul’s Biography in Josephus: Interview with Felix Asiedu

Book Review: Brant Pitre, Michael Barber, and John Kincaid. Paul, A New Covenant Jew: Rethinking Pauline Theology

Paul Dictated His Letters: How Does *That* Complicate Finding an Original?

“The Way of Christ”: Patristic Reception of Galatians 6:2 (by Cody Matchett)

Mike Bird and Nijay Gupta talk Galatians

Book Review: Galatians: Freedom Through God’s Grace

Paul the slave-master: how early Christians leveraged slaves and their households

What Did Paul Mean by Groaning Creation?

What Was Paul Thinking?

Paul’s Preaching of God’s Word

Christmas thoughts from Ephesians

Time to Rejoice (1 Thessalonians 5)

A Closer Look: Adoption

Did Paul Really Say That?

Paul and the Power of Grace

Book Review: Ben Witherington III and Jason A. Myers, Voices and Views on Paul

What is Romans About?

Meet This Book: Paul and the Power of Grace

African American Readings of Paul

A Closer Look: Damascus

BOOK NOTICE: Matthew J. Thomas, Paul’s “Works of the Law” in the Perspective of Second Century Reception

Did Paul give new names to church leaders and co-workers?

Lionel Windsor on supersessionism and the New Perspective

Interview: Arco den Heijer

What do we know about who wrote the letters attributed to Paul? (3)

Sin as Power

Allen Dwight Callahan, “‘Brother Saul’: An Ambivalent Witness to Freedom”

A Closer Look: Rebirth, Conversion, Inheritance

Thinking Like Christ: Philippians 2:5-8

Pauline Eschatology: Dan Oudshoorn’s 2nd Volume on What Paul is Up to

Perspectives on Paul 11-18-20

Sharing in the Son’s Inheritance

New Testament books reviewed in The Christian Century

Sin and Soteriology in Romans

Sin and its Remedy in Paul

Crown-Wearers and Cross-Bearers

Gabriele Boccacini’s new book about Paul

Receiving the Word of God

He’s Coming Back

“Salvation and the Good Life”: Julien C.H. Smith, Author of Paul and the Good Life

Apostle Paul, N.T. Wright, and Supersessionism – The Debate

Matthew and Paul Agreements # 3 – The Torah?

1 Corinthians 15-16 and the Resurrection of the Body: Concluding Pastoral Concerns

Perspectives on Paul for 10-21-20

Who Was Paul?

Who Was Paul? – Interview with Allan R. Bevere

How To Read Paul

Paul as community organizer

Important Interpretive Questions

James Tabor on Jonathan Z. Smith and his Work on Paul

A Jungian perspective on Paul’s dilemma

A mystery revealed

Tarsus — A Very Unusual Roman Building

Pastoral Epistles Commentary by Chris Hutson

A whole book review series by Ben Witherington:

Gentile Christian Identity— Part One

 

 

 

June 19, 2020

This is the next to last in my Apostle Paul APB series. The acronym was too great a punny double entendre to not use and highlight. APB in popular parlance is an “all points bulletin” notifying the police and others to be on the lookout for someone, which connects nicely with Paul’s arrest as well as the quest for the historical figure of Paul. APB also stands for A Polite Bribe, the title of Rob Orlando’s movie about Paul (as well as the book that was released as a companion to the film). Once again there’s a video above that gives you a taste of what is in the movie, which I recommend here once again, and then also includes a round up of recent blogging about Paul below. If you haven’t seen the movie yet, or haven’t watched it recently, now is as good a time as any to check it out.

Around the blogosphere on Paul:

Romans 1:1-16 – Translation, Notes, and Paraphrase

Notes on the historical Paul and his intellectual activity

The Apostle Paul in Context: Jewish, Scriptural, Greco-Roman

Keck on Why Paul Wrote So Little about Jesus’ Public Ministry

You’re Reading Romans All Wrong. Here’s Why.

Is the Righteousness of God the Gift of Righteousness?

What is the “Gospel” according to Paul? Galatians 3:8 Offers a Big Clue

Listening to the Conversation on Paul and Faith: Harrisville’s The Faith of St. Paul

Listening to the Conversation on Paul and Faith (4): Downs’s and Lappenga’s The Faithfulness of the Risen Christ

GUEST POST: Paul’s Version Of Jesus Re-Examined by Jim Palmer

Translating Philippians: Reflections on the Art of Bible Translation: Part 1

Translating Philippians: Reflections on the Art of Bible Translation: Part 2 (Phil 2:1-11)

Translating Philippians: Reflections on the Art of Bible Translation (Phil 2:12-30)

Translating Philippians: Reflections on the Art of Bible Translation: Phil 3:1-21

Translating Philippians: 4:1-23

A Bird’s Eye-View of Philippians

Listening to the Conversation on Paul and Faith (2): Gupta’s Paul and the Language of Faith

My Interview with Brian LePort about Paul, A New Covenant Jew

Paul’s Core Convictions about Christianity

Mis(Understanding) Philippians: Part 1—Where Was Paul Imprisoned?

Philippian Lockdown: Intentional Friendships

Philippian Lockdown: Changed Perspectives

Philippian Lockdown: A Sense of Proportion

Philippian Lockdown: Don’t Grumble?

Philippian Lockdown: Missionary Letters

What is the Body of Christ in 1 Corinthians 12?

Pauline Politics? Yes, Please!

The unknown God, your own poets, and the man God chose: Paul on the Areopagus (Acts 17)

Paul’s Dasmascus Road Experience and the Message of Easter (Peter von der Osten-Sacken)

Book Review: David Bomar, Journeys of the Apostle Paul

Max Lee’s new book on Paul’s “moral milieu” is now available

Ken Schenck introduces 2 Thessalonians

Justified by Faithfulness

Max Lee, “Natural Desire as a Moral Index of What Is Good: What Paul and the Epicureans Have to Say about the Orders of Pleasure.”

David Opderbeck has an ongoing series studying 1 Corinthians

Paul’s Use of Job and Psalms in 1 Cor. 3:19-20

1 Corinthians 5-6

“Greet one another” (2 Cor 13). But no holy kissing. And no joyful singing.

Romans 13 and Protests

A quote from Paul: An Apostle’s Journey And another: The Six Million Dollar Man. And another on “real Christian leadership”. And another asking “Is this church?” And one on taking the form of a servant. And one on martyrdom. (Can you tell this is a whole series?)

Essays Celebrating Paul Livermore—an Incomparable Faculty Colleague

The recent book Paul and the Marginalized is reviews by The Christian Century.

Andrew Perriman explains why he disagrees with N. T. Wright on “propitiation by his blood.”

Sermon: One example of evangelism

Steve Walton preaches from Acts 17

Craig Keener on Acts 17:16-19 and 17:22-34

Recently read: Barclay’s ‘Paul and the Gift’

Paul’s threefold theology

Peace With God

Romans: 5 Books Every Pastor Should Read

1-2 Corinthians: 5 Books Every Pastor Should Read

Galatians: 5 Books Every Pastor Should Read

Philippians: 5 Books Every Pastor Should Read

Colossians and Ephesians: 5 Books Every Pastor Should Read

How do we discern ethics in the writings of Paul?

Sneak Peek: The New Cambridge Companion to St. Paul, ed. Bruce W. Longenecker

Paul, Participation, and Ethics

Praise as Defiance in the Face of Suffering and Death

The Message of Love— Part Thirty

Romans and Galatians from the Perspective of Paul’s Gospel?

Imagination as a lens for making sense of the world

N. T. Wright’s “broken signposts” part 1

The Gospel as More Than “Words”: The Bates-McKnight Controversy and Graham Twelftree’s New Book

Roman Faith and Christian Faith

Book Notice: Apostle of Persuasion, by James W. Thompson

Public Lecture: The Household Codes and the House Church Context (VIDEO)

Book Notice: Defending Shame, Its Formative Power in Paul’s Letters (Te-Li Lau)

Was Paul still Jewish after accepting Jesus?

Craig Keener on Acts 18

May 29, 2020

Rabbi Rachel Mivka’s finale to this wonderful event sounded like it could be depressing and undermine our enthusiasm, given that it asked bluntly what the point of exploring vocation is when the world is going to end. She teaches “Living into our Commitments and Enacting Social Change,” and observed that no matter where she puts the climate crisis in the syllabus, it triggers despair. Before that they are fiery activists. A clip from the TV show The Newsroom conveys the data and the reason for this reaction.

We seem to already be doomed, with it too late to reverse what is happening. If so, then what is the value of working on these things?
This phenomenon has led to the development of a new term: “solastalgia” (Glenn Albrecht, 2005). Some speak of “futilitarianism.” It can also be called climate depression, ecological grief, or similar things. These terms denote mental or existential distress caused by climate change. Mikva mentioned the acronym TEOTWAWKI as well. Students get their news from John Oliver, and he provides this attempt at “a statistically representative climate change debate.”

The prospect of future doom impacts how we discuss vocation. Here are her recommendations:
  1. Cultivate resources for and reservoirs of hope. Social scientists have shown overwhelming fear distances people from a problem leading to disengagement, giving up. Repentance, prayer, and charity (righteousness) transform the evil of the decree (from High Holy Day liturgy). Later in her talk she quoted Yoda in the Empire Strikes Back, saying that hope and focusing on more than our own selves is essential to making a difference in the anthropocene).
  2. When you are starving with a tiger, the tiger starves last (quote from Pogo the Possum). We need to focus on cultivating what kind of people students will be. Some prepper sites acknowledge we cannot make it alone, but still focus on the individual. Those who study the impact of catastrophe know that we will depend on each other in ways we can hardly imagine. We need to focus on vocation in terms of us and not just me. Resilience and meaning-making are critical. Denial doesn’t help children cope, posing the problem as something to be solved in the long term doesn’t either; what does help is a combination of problem-solving and meaning-making. Relinquishing is also a key skill. We need to challenge an overly anthropocentric focus. She also quoted from the Tanna of bei Eliahu and Joseph ibn Kaspi on Deuteronomy.
Isaiah called people to change their ways in response to approaching catastrophe. The nation chose door B, eat and drink and deny. Mikva quoted Plenty Coups, Alaxchiia Ahu, 1848-1932, Chief of the Crow: “The hearts of my people fell to the ground…after this, nothing happened.” She also shared that when a Catholic she knows insisted that even if the science is true, God has a plan, she quoted Laudato Si and Thessalonians back at them. She spoke to us about Revelation as “the inescapable sourcebook for Western anxieties about the end of the world.” The Republicans created national parks and the endangered species act and can be reminded of this.
65-85% of Muslims believe the Mahdi will come in their lifetime. It is not just Evangelical Christians who think about eschatology. Every religion can be understood in a way that leads to complacency, and all offer resources for activism. Religious studies classrooms provide a perfect place to think about vocation in relation to these topics.
Dr. Jennifer Atkinson offers a class “Environmental Grief and Climate Anxiety.” There was a Seattle Times article about it. She responded in High Country News to comments ridiculing the course, with the headline “Addressing climate grief makes you a badass, not a snowflake.”
Mikva also directed our attention to The Good Grief Network. She quoted Anne Lamotte who said that almost everything will work again if we unplug it for a little, including ourselves.
“Almost everything will work again if you unplug it for a few minutes. That includes you.”
Some have been asking whether a college education is worth it in this context. This provides an opportunity to make a point that many of us in higher education have been making all along: the purpose of education only makes sense if it is considered in a broader context tha career preparation. Focusing on this topic is not about sending all our students into climate science. As Thoreau said, “If you would learn the secrets of Nature, you must practice more humanity.” One can teach a course on “Vocation and The Apocalypse” that has McCarthy’s The Road as a central text.
One can sum up this wonderfully helpful presentation in this way: Vocation matters now more than ever. Our task as educators is to figure out the ways in which it matters, but more importantly, to teach courses that allow students to figure that out for themselves.
Just a few notes on the Q&A after the presentation.
As a pedagogical practice, it may be worth asking students to conclude with something that gives them hope.
I found myself thinking about developing a course about sacred and secular visions of the end of the world.
A key point is that it is a problem when we focus on a topic (including a crisis) at too large or too small a scale. We need to find and organize things around our human scale of activity.
Here are some linksto other things that relate to this post and this workshop’s theme:

Council for Foreign Relations webinar on religion and climate change

From Butler University’s Center for Faith and Vocation:

Discovering Vocation

Just Peace Internship

What Will You Do With Your Second Chance?

We’re not all in this together

Somewhat relevant to religious literacy:

The Old Testament in the News

On climate change and despair from a religious perspective: “Climate Justice Starts Locally.”
See also:

Pale Horse, Pale Rider

Does “End-Time Apathy” Explain Why So Many Evangelicals Don’t Care About the Environment?

Vocation matters in this time of pandemic

Vocational Discernment Is Not a Luxury

Grief as the Garden of Compassion

Character and calling in a time of crisis

Design Thinking and Vocational Exploration

Is there a limit to optimism when it comes to climate change?

We Need Climate Education in Schools: A High School Student Speaks Out

Deep dive into climate education courtesy of the NCSE

What the pandemic teaches us about living with trauma

Related to the plenary talk, there is a call for papers for the journal Religions for a special issue on climate change (there have also been a lot of calls for papers on religion and the pandemic). There is also a call for papers on how educators can prepare students for a climate-changed worlda call for papers on the climate crisis and first year seminarsa call for papers on the “Climate of Fatigue,” and another call for papers on pandemic, global warming, and psychology.

April 4, 2020

In this APB I share a clip about Rob Orlando’s movie Apostle Paul: A Polite Bribe in which he asks directly whether Paul was guilty in relation to the laws of Rome as they existed in his time. Even asking the question is important, since we so often equate whether someone was guilty of lawbreaking with whether they were wrong in a moral sense. But those are separate questions, even if our ideal is and should be to have the illegal and the immoral coincide to a large extent. But even then things get complicated.

Elsewhere around the blogs on the subject of Paul the apostle:

Andrew Perriman on whether Paul thought of Jesus as an “angel of God” (and if so, what he might have meant by that).

Bart Ehrman on Paul on the status of women and the Thecla legends

Preliminary Scaffolding: Constructing Paul

A couple from The Sacred Page 2.0:

A Noun for “the New Christ-faith” Preached by Paul

OUR NEW BOOK: Paul, A New Covenant Jew: Rethinking Pauline Theology

Paul’s Suffering and Hardship Catalogues

Matthew J. Thomas on “Works of the Law” in Paul’s Second-Century Reception

What’s Paul Got to Do with It?: Using Visual Media in the Religious Studies Classroom

Christian Factions and God’s One Temple: Part 1

Excommunication in 1 Corinthians 5:1-13

Translation Issues in 1 Corinthians 6:9

http://jesusmemoirs.wordpress.com/2020/02/21/the-paradoxical-wisdom-of-the-cross-1-corinthians-118-216/

1 Corinthians 7:10 and the Saying of the Lord about Divorce

Paul on Singleness and Marriage in 1 Corinthians 7

1 Corinthians 8:1-11:1 and Idol Meat

Harold W. Attridge and David L. Bartlett on Idol Meat

The Theological Interpretation of 1 Corinthians 11:3

“Handing Over” in 1 Corinthians 11

The Lord’s Supper in 1 Corinthians 11:23-25

1 Corinthians 13 in Context

The Misuse of 1 Corinthians 14:34-35

Paul, the Shema, and Christology

The Textual Mechanic on Paul’s Letter-Carriers

“Writing to the Romans: Philo of Alexandria and Paul”

Christian Factions and God’s One Temple: Part II

The first of four “big ideas” from Paul and the Language of Faith

Theology Curator podcast on the above with Nijay Gupta

Adam in Paul: Unique or archetype?

Review of Steve Chalke’s The Lost Message of Paul Part 1

Review of Steve Chalke’s The Lost Message of Paul Part 2

Review of Christians in Caesar’s Household 

Introduction to 1 Thessalonians by Ken Schenck

Turkey Day 1 – Hagia Sofia, Blue Mosque and the Museums

Turkey Day 2 – Perge and the Perge Museum

Turkey Day 3 – Colossae, Laodicea, and Hierapolis

Turkey Day 4 – Sardis and Smyrna

Turkey Day 5 – Pergamum

Turkey Day 6 – Didyma, Miletus and Priene

Turkey Day 7 – Ephesus

From Craig Keener, an hour-long video introduction to Romans, a discussion of Romans 15:1-7, and an exploration of being “in Christ” and related concepts

Interview with Jarvis Williams on Galatians

Reading Romans with Eastern Eyes

Bird and Gupta Commentary on Philippians August 2020

Paul and Supersessionism

When Paul Got It Wrong

Matthew vs. Paul on Gentiles and Torah

In Stone and Story: An Interview with Dr. Bruce W. Longenecker

Daily Gleanings (27 May 2019)

What Did Paul Claim to Have Seen? “Last of All He Appeared Also to Me”

Getting inside the head of Paul and Jesus

What exactly is Paul’s gospel?

OnScript Podcast about Paul and the Language of Faith

Jeanette Hagen Pifer – Faith as Participation

Has ‘Church Unity’ Become an Oxymoron?

Holiness and Judgment: ΦΘΕΊΡΩ in 1 Corinthians 3:16–17 by Ethan Johnson

Paul and the Language of Faith, 4 Big Ideas: #4—Revisiting Paul and Covenantal Nomism

Paul and the Language of Faith Wins Best Book Award (Outreach Magazine)

A forthcoming book will challenge some widespread assumptions about Paul

Bob Cornwall preached on Paul and discerning the deeper magic of God. See too his sermon on Abraham’s children in Romans 4.

A brief introduction to Philippians

Bart Ehrman has things on his blog related to Paul and Jesus as new Adam

 


Browse Our Archives